Chris Johnson

Trump’s statement was questioning DEI.

He, and many of us on the right, believe that DEI means hiring unqualified people. If the criteria for hiring includes anything that is something about the person which is immalleable, then it is unacceptable.

Years ago, we hired a woman to do technical writing. Having read some of her non-technical work, I expected this would work out. When she started submitting her work to me, I red penned it.

This hurt her feelings.

It hurt her feelings so much that she went to HR to complain about how mean I was to her.

The answer, use a green pen.

She wasn’t getting any better. My partner and I had a lunch meeting to discuss what to do with her.

She had graduated from law school but had failed the bar.

He was terrified, rightly so, that she would sue us if we fired her. We were afraid that she would use her status as a “woman” to claim that she was fired because she was a woman, not because she couldn’t do the job.

We agreed to move her to a different part of the company, where she would not do as much harm. It didn’t really help.

There was a lot more having to do with her, up to and including hiring a new HR person to fire her without fear.

She wasn’t hired because she was female, she was kept on because she was female.

At that time, we would have loved to have hired a black, female, physically disabled, capable person. Why? Because all the highly skilled positions in our company were white males. Those were the people who applied, those were the people that had the merit. Those were the people we hired.

Affirmative Action and DEI have caused significant harm to our country. Removing it from our culture is a good thing.

Chris Murphy says the quiet part out loud, and doesn’t even realize it.

He immediately went to “stopping DEI” is an attack on women and blacks. He is admitting that he believes that women and black cannot qualify when there is a merit-based hiring policy in place.

This is why only leftists believe that minorities, PoC are to stupid or lazy or broke to be able to get a voter ID.

Wednesday night, a regional jet, meaning not a jumbo, collided with a Black Hawk Helicopter over the Potomac River.

There does not appear to be any survivors.

There are two major airfields in Washington, DC proper.  There is Andrews Air force Base (I think it was renamed) and the Ronald Reagan Internation airfield.  Along with those two airfields, there are several military installations that have helicopter operations.

For perspective, the Aberdeen Proving Grounds had an airfield, 4 helicopter pads “outside the fence” and an unknown number inside the fence.

In other words, there is a bunch of air traffic in the area.

What I would normally see is helicopters flying relatively low over the river.  Runway 33 is pointed at the river.  Many years ago, a pilot dropped a plane into the Potomac because he didn’t de-ice his aircraft.

Even with the lights of the fixed wing aircraft on, the helicopter(s) likely didn’t notice it as it was above, descending to land.

Depending on exactly where the helicopters were, relative to the plane, the pilots of the plane were unlikely to see the helicopters.

Moreover, I doubt that civilian aircraft radar has good detection capabilities for low-flying helicopters.

If anything, it is likely the fault of the air traffic controller.

The plane was a CRJ at 1200 feet just south of the Woodrow Bridge. It was getting ready to land on runway 33.

PAT25 was the helo.  JIA5342 was the CRJ.  The DCQ tower asks, “PAT25, do you have the CRJ in sight?”

The military aircraft does not respond, just a few seconds later tower says, “PAT25, pass behind the CRJ”.

The crash happens a few moments later.

Tower should have ordered CRJ to turn left to heading 270 and to climb to 3000.

Here is the track of the aircraft in the air when the crash took place along with the audio.

For the past week, my feed has been filled with democrat hacks spewing their hate and lies.  This isn’t a good representation.  Why not?  Because yesterday I read the same words on a dozen tweets from high-profile democrat hacks.

This is a difficult post for me.

I want the Supreme Court to hear a Second Amendment case this term. I don’t think it is going to happen.

The normal procedure is for a case to get on the docket. The Court gives the party time to file briefs. Once all the briefs are filed, the case is ready for the next step.

The next step is for the Justices to discuss the case in private. This is done in Conference.

There are Wed. and Fri. Conferences. Cases that are petitioning for cert are discussed in the Friday Conferences.

We are informed when a case will be discussed by an entry in the case docket of the form “DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2025”

During the Conference, the Justices will make decide to deny cert in a number of the cases. They will decide to grant cert in others. And some they will need more time to discuss.

In general, we hear about the results of the Conference on the following Monday. This is when the “Order List” is released.

The Order List will consist of GVRs. These are of the form “The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The Judgement is vacated, and the case is remanded to the COURT for consideration in light of CASE“.

There will be Orders In Pending Cases. These are motions not related to granting cert. They are motions for stays, to file under seal, to proceed in forma pauperis (in the form of a pauper.)

Then there is the “Certiorari Denied”. This is a list of case numbers and case names. That is it. No other information is supplied.

There are other sections for Mandamus Denied, Rehearings Denied, and Attorney Discipline.

Finally, there are statements of the Justices.

These are of the form, “NAME, dissenting”, Title of case, case number, and date.

Following this is the actual dissent. This can be short or long, depending on the Justice writing it and how much they have to say about the denial of certiorari.

I’ve seen them as short as a page and some extending a half dozen or more pages.

What about the cases that aren’t listed?

This is where people get to panic.

If a case is not listed in the Order List, it can be for many reasons. The Justices might be planning a “Miscellaneous Order” for later in the week. We’ve seen that from time to time.

Unfortunately, the most likely reason is that the Justices decided to deny cert.

Given Thomas’ support of the Second Amendment, if they are denying cert, he will be writing a statement dissenting with the judgement.

Conclusion

I’m torn, I don’t want these cases to be denied cert. On the other hand, I can’t think of a reason that there is nothing posted about them, except that there is a dissenting Justice writing a statement.

Last week was a week of winning with Trump 2.0.

Maybe we’ll hear really good news later this week. I’ll keep an eye out for any news and keep you updated.

I keep feeling better and better. We are in day 7 of Trump 2.0 and it keeps getting better.

Watching the left melt down just feels good.

We are still in a holding pattern. At this instant, the January 27th order list has been released. Neither case is on it.

This means that neither case has been summarily denied certiorari.

They were not granted certiorari, either.

Later today, the dockets should be updated.

If they are relisted, we still have a chance of a decision in the 2024 term.

If they are not relisted, it suggests that there was a denial of cert and one or more of the justices are writing a “statement” dissenting with the denial.

Perspective. A case was conferenced on the 10th, 17th, and 24th. Today they issued the denial of cert. Thomas wrote a dissent, joined by Alito.

This is the same pattern as Snope and Ocean State Tactical.

I do not believe that certiorari has been denied.

If it is granted next week, the Petitioner’s briefs will be filed by March 12, 2025. This still gets us to oral arguments for the 2024 term.

According to my brief research, We are pushing oral arguments into May at this point. The Court doesn’t often hear cases in May.

Having said this, the Court sets their own rules. If they don’t set oral arguments soon, they will likely hear the cases in early October with an opinion out December 2025 or January 2026.

Happy Birthday(ish) Ally!

It was her birthday, very recently, send her a Happy Birthday!

I am SOOOO upset

Here is the item description:

• [Support Mini ITX Motherboard] ITX Motherboard dimension 6.7*6.7in (17*17cm).
• [Support Flex Power Supply Unit] Flex PSU dimension 3.21*1.59*5.91in (81.5*40.5*150mm).
• [Support 1 Single Slot Full Height PCI-e Expansion Card] To add video card or network card or more.
• [Come With 1 Front USB 3.0 or 2.0 Port] 2 in 1 cable only plug one connector to motherboard.

Two MAJOR issues for me. First, it doesn’t support a 170x170mm motherboard. No, it supports a 170x167mm motherboard. If you put a 170×170 in the case, there is not enough room to put the cover on.

That lead to time in the shop grinding off the offending metal.

The clearance for the board is very tight under the four disk bays. I had to get a different CPU cooler that was low profile. That’s ok. Everything went together once I got the fan in place.

Then I went to install the PCIe 10G SFP+ card. There is no space in the back for that card! They put the damn full height opening in the worng place.

FAFO

I’m stealing this from X. I was going to write about this, I had multiple sources. I was going to quote published documents. Instead, I’ll let this stand for itself.

To fully understand just how remarkable today’s exchange with Colombia was, you need to understand how Washington DC has traditionally worked through these sorts of issues, and the different way it works now under Trump.

I’ll illustrate.

Traditional Approach:

1. Colombia…

— Cynical Publius (@CynicalPublius) January 26, 2025

To fully understand just how remarkable today’s exchange with Colombia was, you need to understand how Washington DC has traditionally worked through these sorts of issues, and the different way it works now under Trump.

I’ll illustrate.

Traditional Approach:

1. Colombia announces it will not take our repatriation flights.
2. On Monday, the State Department convenes an interagency task force with DoD, NSC, DEA, INS, ICE, Commerce, Treasury and Homeland Security.
3. The task force meets for four days and develops a position paper.
4. The position paper is rejected by the Secretary of State, who is unhappy that insufficient equity considerations are built into the process.
5. The task force reconvenes a week later to redevelop three new, equity-centric courses of action and create a new position paper.
6. The process is delayed a week because Washington DC gets three inches of snow.
7. SecState approves the new position paper for interagency circulation, and considerable input is received from the heads of other departments so the task force must reconvene.
8. The original three proposed responsive courses of action are scrapped in favor of a new, fourth course of action that achieves the worst aspects of the three prior courses of action but satisfies the interagency.
9. Someone in State who disagrees leaks to the Washington Post, who writes a story about how ineffective the Presidential administration is.
10. The White House Chief of Staff sets up a session three days later to brief the President, who approves the new fourth course of action.
11. Over a month after the issue is first raised, the State Department Public Affairs Officer holds a press conference announcing that Colombia has agreed to try to send fewer criminals into the US and everyone declares victory.

Trump Approach:

1. Colombia announces it will not take our repatriation flights.
2. After a par-5 third hole where he goes one under par, Trump uses his iPhone to post on social media as to how the USA will destroy Colombia’s economy if they do not do what the USA demands.
3. By the time Trump gets to the par-4 sixth hole, Colombia’s President has agreed to repatriate all the illegal Colombians in his own plane, which he will pay for.
4. Trump finishes three under par and goes to the clubhouse for a Diet Coke where he posts a gangsta AI image of himself and the new FAFO Doctrine.
5. Winning.

See the difference? It’s called LEADERSHIP.

For a little bit of clarity on how heavy handed Trump 2.0 was, Colombia exports around a billion dollars worth of roses every year to America. In order for those roses to be sold, they have to get expedited inspections. They also have to be reasonably prices.

With the 25% tariffs, Trump was going to put the hurting on 31% of their economy. But it is better. If Colombia had not caved, the tariffs were going to go up to 50%.

In addition, Trump ordered full inspections of everything being imported from Colombia. That means that many of those roses would have wilted in transit.

Oh, did you remember that Valentine’s Day is coming up? And that is the biggest sales day in the country for roses.

Whining on X

I could write a dozen articles about whining liberals over on X. The most common whine is, “a bad thing is going to happen. This is what you morons voted for. Don’t you feel stupid now?”

I’ve known about “System On a Chip” and “System On a Board” for many years. I have one of the early embedded software development kits, including some TI chipset.

The most common style of these today is likely the Arduino class of SoC. These things are incredible.

An idea I pitched years ago, for potential military use, was a swarm of small single purpose computers that could be dropped in mass from an aircraft.

Something about the size of a quarter with one or two sensors, a mesh Wi-Fi system, GPS, and a battery. These would drop like the “helicopter” seed pods, scatter over an area, then set up a monitoring network. Using spread spectrum, low power, and burst transmissions, the network might be difficult to detect.

As the sensors detected “things”, they would report to a transmission unit, which would then send a report to home base.

This was all based on a small battery. We figured we could get these things in mass and get them ready to toss out the back of a C130 for less than $100 each.

Today, I can buy a chip that will do that, put it on a custom board with all components for less than $20 in low unit counts.

So SoC, way cool.

The other thing that has been happening is that the physical size requirements for a personal computer have gone way down. Whereas the original XT motherboard was 8.5×11 and the AT was 12×13, we are now seeing Mini-ITX at 6.7×6.7 and even Nano-ITX at 4.7×4.7.

My son found the Mini-ITX form factor computer a few years ago. A full computer that was the size of 3 boxes of .45cal. It weights less.

His computer came with 2 HDMI ports, 4 USB3.2 ports, a headphone jack, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and 1Gb Ethernet. It had upgradable memory and at least one M.2 port. This thing just works.

What is cool about it is that it mounts to the back of a monitor. He needs his keyboard and two power supplies.

It is what I got my lovely wife for Christmas this last year.

Can I ditch the big boxes?

Things go in circles. My primary machine lives in a case I purchased almost 20 years ago. It has a new power supply, an extra video card, and a SAS controller. It is designed to handle 9 internal drives plus the optical drive. It can connect to external SAS cabinets.

It was designed to have 36 TB of storage in a ZFS pool. It is heavy. It requires big fans. It is a workhorse.

But, I’m moving away from ZFS. It is a great system, I love it. It just does not meet my current needs. I’ve moved to ceph, a distributed system.

Ceph does not use raid technology the same way that ZFS does. Instead, it depends on having many nodes with lots of redundancy.

With ZFS, my normal was one parity drive for every 4 data drives. So a 20% overhead.

In its fast mode, ceph has a 200% overhead. For every block of data stored, it requires two copies. There are modes that are more optimized, but they all seem to have higher overhead than a raid system.

But because I don’t need to create 5 drive pools, I can do something different. More boxes with just a few drives in each.

I don’t need all that motherboard. I don’t need all that memory. I don’t even need all that much CPU.

Some of the servers I’m using only support two SATA drives, but have an NVMe slot. Still, it is a big box.

My answer was to go looking. I found a cheap ITX-Mini motherboard. It would have been cheaper off the boat, but I found it on Amazon. A used i5 CPU. It will handle an i7 and maybe an i9. A cheap 128GB NVMe, and some DDR3 ram. Toss in a CPU cooler and it is a fully functional system.

It only has a Gigabit Ethernet, but it has a PCI slot. It has four SATA ports.

The cheap case I found has four hot swap bays for SATA drives. It takes a Mini-ITX motherboard. This thing is perfect for what I require.

So yes, this can do the job. I can downsize.

What else is cool about these Mini-ITX boards?

They really are designed with specific markets in mind. I found one with 2 2.5Gb RJ45 and 2 10Gb SFP+ ports. It has GPIO ports, comes in an extruded aluminum heat sink/case. It replaced the old router and everything got faster.

There are versions with multiple RJ45 ports. Different layouts. Different CPU designs. Some come with a CPU on the board, making them a SoB. Some are AMD, some are Intel based.

What I couldn’t find is a board with four SATA ports, a PCIe slot, and GPIO.

Which brings me back to PI

The board I want needs to have hardware-driven Ethernet, GPIO pins, and serial IO. It also has to be cheap. I think I found it in the Banana PI M2 Ultra.

It has everything I need, it was very cheap, less than dinner for three at the fast food joint.

My step backward? It requires power that I can’t give it. GRRR. So it requires a dedicated power supply.

Oh well, my NTP server is almost here.

For the last 4+ years, I’ve been hearing about the horrible things that illegal aliens have been doing. Rape, murder, kidnapping, child rape, taking over apartment complexes.

The “eating the pets” might be true, or it might not.

The joke of “there are no stray cats near the Chinese Restaurant” has a reason.

What made me sick was the lack of response by law enforcement. There were politicians who showed up to say, “Nothing to see here.” There were politicians who showed up to beg law enforcement to do something.

What didn’t show up were the cops.

Three days into Trump 2.0 and it is obvious that ICE knew where to go and whom to pick up. Outstanding!

Listening to neighbors expressing loud gratitude to the cops is another good sign. They would not be making a sound if they thought those illegals would be back before dark.

I’m liking Trump 2.0.