Second Amendment Jurisprudence
It is sometimes hard for me to understand just how far we’ve come in Second Amendment jurisprudence. I remember the time when there were legal battles and arguments about who did the right extend to.
On one side, there was a group of people saying that the right belonged to the militia. Since the right belonged to the militia, the only people or group of people that had standing to challenge on Second Amendment grounds were the militia. Since the only legal militia was the National Guard, under the control of the state, the only people who had standing to challenge a state law on Second Amendment grounds were the state.
In 2008 the Supreme Court smashed that argument to pieces. They applied their standard methods and stated it plainly: Dick Heller had the constitutional right to have a handgun in his home for self-defense in ready condition. Right?
Nope, the holding was broader than that.
-
- The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Pp. 2–53.
- The Amendment’s prefatory clause announces a purpose, but does not limit or expand the scope of the second part, the operative clause. The operative clause’s text and history demonstrate that it connotes an individual right to keep and bear arms. Pp. 2–22.
- The prefatory clause comports with the Court’s interpretation of the operative clause. The “militia” comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. The Antifederalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable this citizens’ militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms, so that the ideal of a citizens’ militia would be preserved. Pp. 22–28.
- The Court’s interpretation is confirmed by analogous arms-bearing rights in state constitutions that preceded and immediately followed the Second Amendment. Pp. 28–30.
- The Second Amendment’s drafting history, while of dubious interpretive worth, reveals three state Second Amendment proposals that unequivocally referred to an individual right to bear arms. Pp. 30–32.
- Interpretation of the Second Amendment by scholars, courts and legislators, from immediately after its ratification through the late 19th century also supports the Court’s conclusion. Pp. 32–47.
- None of the Court’s precedents forecloses the Court’s interpretation. Neither United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542, 553, nor Presser v. Illinois, 116 U. S. 252, 264–265, refutes the individual-rights interpretation. United States v. Miller, 307 U. S. 174, does not limit the right to keep and bear arms to militia purposes, but rather limits the type of weapon to which the right applies to those used by the militia, i.e., those in common use for lawful purposes. Pp. 47–54.
- Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54–56.
- The handgun ban and the trigger-lock requirement (as applied to self-defense) violate the Second Amendment. The District’s total ban on handgun possession in the home amounts to a prohibition on an entire class of “arms” that Americans overwhelmingly choose for the lawful purpose of self-defense. Under any of the standards of scrutiny the Court has applied to enumerated constitutional rights, this prohibition—in the place where the importance of the lawful defense of self, family, and property is most acute—would fail constitutional muster. Similarly, the requirement that any lawful firearm in the home be disassembled or bound by a trigger lock makes it impossible for citizens to use arms for the core lawful purpose of self-defense and is hence unconstitutional. Because Heller conceded at oral argument that the D. C. licensing law is permissible if it is not enforced arbitrarily and capriciously, the Court assumes that a license will satisfy his prayer for relief and does not address the licensing requirement. Assuming he is not disqualified from exercising Second Amendment rights, the District must permit Heller to register his handgun and must issue him a license to carry it in the home. Pp. 56–64.
- The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Pp. 2–53.
478 F. 3d 370, affirmed.
This wasn’t an as-applied holding; this found that the D.C. law was unconstitutional.
But it was much more important that striking down several laws forbidding The People from having functional firearms in their homes changed how the lower courts (were supposed to) evaluate Second Amendment challenges.
This upset the gun grabbers, so they fought back. Many of the inferior courts said, “D.C. is a special case because it is a federally controlled area, not a state. The Second Amendment does not apply to the states.” Their stated reasoning for this was that the Supreme Court had never explicitly told them that the Second Amendment was a part of the Constitution and applied like everything else in the Constitution.
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals actually said that since the Supreme Court had never said the Second Amendment was part of the Constitution, the state of Illinois did not have to respect it.
This led to McDonald, where the Supreme Court, once again, told the inferior courts, “Stop being jackasses; of course the Second Amendment applies to the states.”
These two cases advanced Second Amendment jurisprudence immensely. They opened the floodgates to a slew of Second Amendment challenges.
And there were actual advances in The People regaining some of their protected rights.
That is, until the inferior courts found a new hook. Interest balancing.
The inferior courts said, “We are too stupid to understand how to evaluate Second Amendment challenges as Heller told us. So we are going to look to First Amendment jurisprudence for guidence.”
While this might sound good on its face, it wasn’t when twisted by the states and inferior courts. First Amendment jurisprudence is littered with free speech exceptions. While the core protected rights are strongly protected, there is a lot of case law that gives rise to exceptions.
Consider political speech. Everybody knows you can get up on your soapbox and start yapping about anything political. But the courts have actually put limits on this. For example, they can restrict the time and place of such speech. You can’t set up your soapbox in the middle of an intersection. You can’t use a megaphone at midnight to make your speech.
The courts have gone further in limiting some types of speech. There are restrictions on certain topics at certain locations. You can’t show pornographic movies on the sidewalk outside a school. Even if that would be an acceptable location to give a political speech.
The gist was that there was a “core” protected right that had the strongest protections, and then there were other parts of the protected right that were not so strongly protected.
In First Amendment jurisprudence, the courts balanced how much the modern day regulation infringed on the “core” protected right and balanced it against the “good” of the modern day regulation.
In the inferior courts, they went to town with this exception process. When it came to Second Amendment challenges, the courts had three steps: 1) Is the plain text of the Second Amendment implicated? 2) How much does the modern regulation impede the core protected right? 3) What are the benefits of the modern infringement?
Being evil but not stupid, these inferior courts then bypassed the first question: Is the plain text implicated? If they were to answer this question in the negative, that would be a reason for appeals, and their decisions could be overturned on just that. If they said the plain text was implicated, then they have established a record that they could be held to later.
So they did the sidestep; they said, “Without making a determination, we accept that the modern day regulation does implicate the plain text of the Second Amendment.” They never said a single modern day infringement actually implicated the Second Amendment.
Having made that assumption, they then evaluated the infringement against the core protect right of armed self-defense within the home. This is similar to evaluating a rape by how much lube was being used. Yes, you have a right not to be raped, but they used a lot of lube so it didn’t hurt all that much.
Having decided how much it was hurting The People, they then looked at the government’s stated intentions, not the results, not what was actually happening, but on what the state said their intentions were. If those intentions were “good enough” when balanced against the pain The People were feeling, the courts ruled in favor of the state.
The reality was that the courts were working backwards. They wanted “the rape” to continue, so they looked at the government’s stated intention in passing the regulation, decided what level of scrutiny would survive that intention, and then justified that.
We were right back where we started from. The inferior courts in gun grabbing states were consistently (always, the Ninth Circuit Court en banc has never ruled against the state in a Second Amendment Challenge) finding for the state on interest balancing reasons.
In 2022, the Supreme Court issued their opinion in Bruen. Bruin took issue with the two-step shuffle. Justice Thomas wrote that the two step shuffle was one step too far and restated Heller’s core jurisprudence: When the plain text of the Second Amendment is implicated, the burden shifts to the government to prove that the modern regulation is a match for this Nation’s history and tradition of firearms regulation.
The holding in Bruen was that NYC’s may issue game was inconsistent with the Constitution. That part of the “core” protected rights of the Second Amendment was the ability to carry, to bear arms, outside the home.
The gun grabbers ran back to their corners and immediately put into place new laws to stop people from legally carrying. In some ways, the people of New York were worse off after Bruen than before. Before Bruen, if you were wealthy, connected, or lucky, you could get a permit to carry. Once you had that permit, you could carry in most places. After the Bruen tantrum, The People could get permits, but they couldn’t carry anyplace because every place they wanted to carry was off-limits, or the ability to get to a place where they could legally carry put them at risk of going through a prohibited location.
Consider a subject of New York state who has a permit to carry. They want to drive through NYC to get to some place. If they were to drive through Times Square, they would be in violation of one of the many locations where carry is prohibited.
As the governor of New York state said when asked where people could legally carry, “I don’t know, maybe some streets?”
The inferior courts were in a quandary; they had clear marching orders from their bosses, but that would require them to overturn most gun control laws. They had to do something.
They immediately pivoted to “We are to stupid to do our jobs.” Even though they have been through years of schooling on how to interpret and understand the laws of this Nation, even though they have studied case law for nearly a decade before being allowed to practice law, and even though most of them have some experience before being appointed to the bench, history was beyond them.
The legal profession is nearly 100% about interpreting the legal history of this Nation. How can a judge make a ruling on anything without looking to history? It could be the history of last week or of 250 years ago. If a judge is looking at a challenge to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), they are looking at history from nearly 60 years ago when the Gun Control Act of 1968 was passed.
If they are looking at machine gun regulations, they are looking at laws from 1986. Before Heller and Bruen, the courts routinely looked at the Sullivan Act from 1911.
All of that is “Legal History” and that is all that Bruen demanded they do.
When that wasn’t making headway, they turned to sensitive places.
And still they were losing ground.
Under Joe Biden, the DoJ brought Rahimi to The Court. This was an attempt by the Biden DoJ to gut Bruen. The thinking was that Mr. Rahimi was a bad man doing bad things who deserved to be disarmed and incarcerated. We still won and Second Amendment Jurisprudence advanced again.
The important parts of Rahimi, for us, was that the Supreme Court clearly stated that any loss of Second Amendment protected rights could only be temporary. There is no such thing as a lifetime loss of gun rights. The second big thing was that to remove someone’s Second Amendment protected rights, the person must be adjudicated a danger to themselves or others.
This is actually a death knell for Red Flag laws. It hasn’t happened yet, but until you are adjudicated in a court of law with proper representation, you cannot lose your Second Amendment protected rights.
Because of Rahimi, there are hundreds of challenges to 18 U.S.C. §922(g)1, felon in possession. Some of these have made it to the Supreme Court and are waiting on final disposition; some have been rejected. But for every one that made it to that stage, I’m sure there are dozens that were resolved in an inferior court.
Which brings us to June, 2026. The Supreme Court has issued two new Second Amendment opinions.
The first was Hemani, another case with bad facts. Mr. Hemani is a bad man, in my opinion, but not in the opinion of the courts. He hasn’t been adjudicated of any violence. In fact, his charges were simply one count of violating 18 U.S.C. §922(g)3.
18 U.S.C. § 922(g) 3
It shall be unlawful for any person —
- who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802));
to ship or transport in interstate or foreign commerce, or possess in or affecting commerce, any firearm or ammunition; or to receive any firearm or ammunition which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.
Nothing about his terrorist-loving parents nor the fact that he is a dual citizen and also loves him some terrorists.
This was an as-applied opinion. It will be used to help other people who are accused under §922(g)3, but it doesn’t strike down §922(g)3 as is. We’ll have to wait to see how the government responds. The most likely change would be the removal of “unlawful user.”
As Hemani pointed out, tying the loss of Constitutionally protected rights to definitions under complete and arbitrary definitions by a federal agency is inconsistent with the Constitution.
But that is not the big part of Hemani. The important part was that it reaffirmed Heller, Bruen, and Rahimi as well as defining how to do regulation comparisons.
This is a big step forward. The inferior courts have a bad habit of saying “close enough” when it isn’t. It makes sense why this case was taken. It allowed The Court to issue an opinion focused on deriving analogous regulations from this Nation’s history and tradition of firearms regulations.
When the court issued Wolford v. Lopez, it was a win for people living under vampire rules. This is relief for millions of people. It didn’t sound like it was an important win for Second Amendment jurisprudence.
I was wrong. It is a huge win for us.
Whereas Hemani took on the “how” and the “why” of matching, Wolford v. Lopez takes on the inferior courts, pushing the historical analysis into the linguistic analysis for a Second Amendment challenge.
We know how to do a plain text analysis. The inferior courts have said they are too stupid to do so.
U.S.A. v. Hemani 608 U.S. ___ (2026)
This opinion is great for the Second Amendment community and the country as a whole.
First, what is the “Holding”. The holding is the courts ruling in the case. This is the thing that is of interest to the parties directly involved. It is the guilty/not guilty part of the case.
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a Per Curiam opinion on January 31st, 2025. They found that 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(3) was unconstitutional as applied to Mr. Hemani. Per Cuiam means that there were no oral arguments before the court as the court felt there was no need. They had enough information based on what had been filed with them. They may or may not have considered what the parities had to say or they could have just read what the lower court’s opinion was.
Regardless, they ruled that Mr. Hemani could not be charged under §922(g)3.
One of the interesting details of this case is that Mr. Hemani had no other charges against him. There was the sole count (information) that he had violated 18 U.S.C. §922(g)3. The government was arguing that his admiting to using pot several times a week and there being a gun in his home was enough to get him 15 years behind bars and the loss of his firearms rights.
The United States was not happy about this outcome. They appealed to the Supreme Court, and Certiorari was granted.
As a Second Amendment advocate this scared me. I, and others, were concerned that The Court would issue a weak opinion because Hemani is a bad man. Yeah, he is. His mother is worse and his father not much better. They are actively interacting with foreign bad actors. This is barely touched on in this opinion.
The Court continues to remind us that no right is absolute, but this opinion does a good job of explaining that “no right is absolute” requires the government to do the heavy lifting of text and historical tradition.
So what is the focus on this opinion and why do the liberals dislike the opinion they signed on to?
The focus is on how to determine if there is a match to this Nation’s historical tradition of firearms regulation.
It starts by saying that it does not address if 1864 or 1791 is the proper date.
Why?
Because this is federal gun law. The only date possible is 1791 and The Court knows this. The Court explicitly states this does not answer that question but not why. It goes on to say it doesn’t matter because the government loses regardless of the year.
But the opinion starts by given a better definition of “text”. <q>To determine when the government infringes the Second Amendment, we begin by asking whether the Amendment’s terms cover the conduct in question.</q> This is a wider definition than “the text of the Second Amendment”. In Heller The Court defined “terms” this reference harkens back to the Heller decision.
We’ve defined these terms, use them. An important but subtle thing.
We move on to “require a historical twin” or “precise … historical precursors”. And this is where it starts to get good.
Gorsuch explitcly states that while a historical regulation must match in “why” and “how”, these are not the limit on what must match. There are other features that might cause failure. The anti-gun people will try to twist this to mean that “how” and “why” don’t have to match if they find something else, but that’s not my reading of the line.
Be on the lookout for new arguments from the state (bad guys) arguing that some new simularity between today’s regulation and some past regulation make them the same. Look, both these laws talk about spitting; this means we can ban guns if you spit on the sidewalk.
Regardless, the rest of the opinion focuses heavily on how to compare a modern regulation’s “how” and “why” to this Nation’s historical tradition of firearms regulation.
In the end, the holding is as applied to Mr. Hemeni. In reality, parts of §922(g)3 will change or have changed. Parts of the form 4473 will need to change. People being put in prison for smoking pot will stop. And the link of §922(g)3 to the Controlled Substances Act(CSA) is broken, forever.
The place where things get more interesting is in Justice Thomas’ concurance. First he agrees with everything the opinion has to say, but then he says that somebody really should question if §922(g) is consistent with the Constitution.
This is as big if not bigger than his concurance on a resent Per Curium where he said that it was time The Court started issuing Per Curium opinions to help regular people, not just criminals and not over trivial mistakes that make no difference in the outcome. He wrote this to address the fact that The Court will often grant cert and then issue a Per Curium when some technical issue happened at the appellate court or lower court. Frequently these Per Curiums change nothing in the final out come but do inform the inferior courts on how to act.
Here hs points out that Congress has been using the commerece clause to gather power where they are not authorized any. The original meaning of the clause was to make sure that the states were not messing with each others commerce. That goods made in one state could be sold in another without teriffs or other government busy body actions.
The Congress has created laws that punish people for making things for use by themselves because that means they are not buying from someone else (commerce) and that someone else could be out of state, therefore affecting interstate commerece. Seriously, there are laws on the books that are justified because making something yourself means you didn’t buy from some big out of state entity.
§922(g) can only exist because the firearm in question might have crossed state lines sometime in the past. You might have purchased it in your state, you might never have left your state, your gun might never have left your state, your gun might even have been manufactured in your state, but that gun might have been sold across state lines.
I expect to see someone file a case on these grounds in the near future. In this way, Thomas is very good at predicting the future.
From Behind Enemy Lines – What do we Need?
I’ve seen this one go around lately, and it has that lovely “feel good” vibe. We need all these touchy feely things, and the future will be just fine.
The problem, of course, is that a colony on mars will help us with drinkable water. Servers orbiting the planet helps us figure out climate issues (because, while I may not see the widespread planet-killing eco disaster the Left claims, we do have things we do poorly, and being able to monitor the planet better would do good things). There’s a non-zero chance that AI might solve our pollinator problem.
I have found that there is a certain part of the Left that seems to believe that if we all just lived on tofu and kale chips, and only drank recycled pee, walked to work, and everyone had a garden, things would immediately reverse and the world would be rosy, and everyone would get along. Cue singing Kumbaya. Oh, I forgot not showering. I’m not sure where that comes in, but they never seem to shower. Ugh.
Now, I have no issue with tofu and kale chips. I rather like both, quite honestly, but I want them when *I* want them, not because nothing else is allowed. I’d rather avoid recycled pee if I can, unless I manage to get shipped off to Mars, in which case bring it on! We almost had most people working from home, and while I am dead set that it should be voluntary and not required (as it was with covid), it did solve a lot of problems. Six weeks into our lovely lock downs, all the smog was gone, plants and bees and gardens and animals were all doing much better. Sort of put shut to the idea that it would take decades if not centuries to repair “all the damage we’ve done.” I do think most people should have a garden, even if all they do is grow some peas or a tomato plant, because it’s good for the soul and it reminds us where food comes from. I think too many people forget that.
The thing is, we can responsibly use modern tools like AI and satellites for many things. I use AI all the time for research, where it cuts down on my “random searching on the interwebz” time. Yes, I verify everything I’m told, because AI is not infallible because WE are not infallible, and it learns from us. But it’s still useful. It takes research from “days or weeks” to “hours or days,” which is huge for me. I use it for organization. I love satellite images, because I can see all sorts of things. I can watch recreations of historical battles done by AI using extant information over real modern maps. It’s amazing. I’m sure people thought gas and electric stoves were the end of the world, at one point. I know that many people fought against the removal of candles and the addition of gas lighting. It’s always hard to accept change when it comes.
But here’s the thing I see… Building a colony on Mars? That means we’ll have terraforming going on, which is absolutely applicable to our own planet. If you can turn Mars red soil into something we can grow in, then we can apply that to the Sahara Desert. If we can explore (in a few decades) the methane oceans of Titan, then maybe we can also create safe ways to navigate the depths of our own oceans. And so on. Progress allows us to learn new things about our own world, even as we explore others.
Then, of course, there’s the idea that was often touted by Heinlein. When humans find a new frontier, they go for it. They go for broke. They do crazy, insane things to go exploring. And there is a certain percentage of our population that are simply wired that way, and no amount of “reprogramming” is going to change them. They SHOULD be encouraged to challenge the new frontiers. The other side of that is that those who leave Earth to go elsewhere will toughen the breed. Those left behind will not advance as quickly as the ones who go out and explore. He believed that those who never face the raw, unforgiving nature of a space frontier are far more likely to embrace socialism, authoritarianism, and conformist rules. (LA Public Library)
The end of the meme says, “That’s the only future I’m interested in.” That seems to be exactly what Heinlein feared, doesn’t it? Because the future I’m interested in includes infinite possibilities. There’s room for those who want to be home bodies, and those who want to explore. For the gardeners and the hunters. For the thinkers and the doers. The burger flippers and the rocket scientists. We need them all, and more. I want to know what’s in the deepest parts of our oceans, and I want to know what’s on that watery planet at the very edge of our telescopic vision. I want to meet aliens, and I want to be at peace with folks at home.
I want all the futures. I’m interested in every single one of them. From AI to pollinators to satellites. All. No boundaries. 🙂
The Intermittent Missive – June 7-13, 2026
New Poll: Democrats And Republicans Live In Different Moral Universes
https://www.prophecynewswatch.
A newly released Gallup survey reveals a nation that is not merely disagreeing over policies but increasingly unable to agree on what is right and wrong. The results paint a picture of two Americas operating from entirely different moral frameworks, with Democrats and Republicans often holding views that appear almost irreconcilable. The numbers are startling.
Civil War 2.0 Weather Report: All It Takes Is A Spark
https://wilderwealthywise.com/
I have maintained the Clock O’Doom at 9, given the open support of assassination and criminality by the GloboLeft and the increase in violence as well as direct interference with ICE and the insertion of the military into law enforcement.
“Avoid crowds – Get Out of the Cities. – NOW. A year/month/week/ day too soon is better than a day too late” – paraphrasing John Wilder @ https://wilderwealthywise.com
SUDDEN LEAD BY UNKNOWN WHO CONCEDED: California’s Big Cheat Run By Fraudster with Shocking Election Recount Past
https://gellerreport.com/2026/
The fraud is so blatant and brazen that the real scandal isn’t the theft itself—it’s the coordinated effort to silence, smear, and destroy anyone who dares expose it.
pic: https://mail.proton.me/api/
HERE
V
COUNTING UNTIL THEY WIN: They Did it – Spencer Pratt OUT, Mamdani-Socialist Unknown Secures Spot in LA Mayoral Election
https://gellerreport.com/2026/
It’s totally normal for the no-name candidate deep in 3rd place to give a tear-filled concession speech on election night and then miraculously receive almost every Democrat vote in the 2 weeks after the election to defeat the most charismatic Republican candidate in decades.
Just another “safe and secure” election in LA.
V
Skid Row Homeless Paid to Vote for Karen Bass and Nithya Raman
https://gellerreport.com/2026/
https://x.com/WallStreetApes/
video – 00:01:12 – https://x.com/WallStreetApes/
Gwyneth Paltrow Reveals She Is “Centrist” – Defies Her “Progressive” Hollywood Husband
https://americanjournaldaily.
Key Takeaways
Gwyneth Paltrow identifies as a centrist, and her progressive husband considers that functionally Republican.
The Democrat Party has shifted so far left that moderate positions are now treated as conservative heresy.
Hollywood’s climate of ideological fear pressures even its most privileged voices into self-censorship.
Free thought and open dialogue remain foundational American values worth defending — loudly.
Why We Carry. K9 Version.
https://miguelgg.substack.com/
Treason – At Home, at Work, and in the Shipping Department
https://www.americanthinker.
Treason takes many forms, and a recent case in the news shows that it can come through normal-looking business transactions, through regular domestic and international purchases and sales.
It was all Government Fugazi – And others as well.
https://miguelgg.substack.com/
A Serious Country Does Not Swap Its Greatest Leader On Banknotes For Little Animals
https://www.zerohedge.com/
The Bank of England has now admitted the quiet part out loud. Historical figures including Winston Churchill were removed from future banknotes after researchers told officials they were “elitist and divisive.”
This is why we don’t care about your outrage
https://miguelgg.substack.com/
TDS by proxy is always fun.?
Monday Memes: The Cat Ate My Homework
https://wilderwealthywise.com/
The Media Wants To Know Why Men Are Walking Away From Liberal Society?
https://www.zerohedge.com/
(Because far-left liberal women are batsh*t crazy – jlr)
NY Knicks Fans Desecrate National Anthem to Spite Trump
https://www.westernjournal.
The vindictive crowd didn’t seem to care that their unpatriotic jeers occurred during a performance of the national anthem.
Muslim Migrant Tries to Behead Man on Belfast Street (VIDEO)
https://gellerreport.com/2026/
This is eerily similar to the Islamic beheading of Lee Rigby on a London street in broad daylight.
Qur’an 47:4, “When you meet the unbelievers, strike necks.”
GRAPHIC video – 00:00:54 – https://x.com/triffic_stuff_/
V
(A warning video – no date – jlr)
vide0 – 00:00:50 – https://x.com/ETareqalmulla/
V
Rioting erupts in Ireland over HORRIFIC attack by Sudanese asylum seeker captured on video
https://www.theblaze.com/news/
A horrific attack in Northern Ireland by a Sudanese asylum seeker has led to rioting by anti-immigration protesters. Video of the shocking attack showed the Sudanese man straddling a man on the ground and hacking at his neck with what appeared to be a kitchen knife.
V
Diversity is our strength: Beheading attempt in Belfast. – NSFW or other places with weak mental constitutions.
https://miguelgg.substack.com/
The video above is what happens when a country refuses to even set and enforce a basic standard of conduct for its immigrants and even go as far as accepting all traits they may bring and eschew and disdain the things and culture that made the country once a palatable place to live. And the final result is extremes that are hard to come back from.
(It seems the rank and file citizens across many civilized countries are starting to rebell against the laissez-faire stance on entitled, violent, jihadist, uncivilized invaders from 3rd world countries that their NWO puppet governments have taken, and are starting to take matters into their own hands and return their countries to the citizens of that country – jlr)
V
Beheading in Florence By Immigrant
https://watchdogreport.org/
https://gellerreport.com/2026/
A Moroccan migrant beheaded a woman near Florence, Italy, while reportedly reciting verses from the Quran — and European media tried to bury the story…Italian authorities have noted the suspect had known mental health problems, which some outlets used to shift focus away from any possible religious motive. Both factors — mental illness and religious ideology — can exist at the same time, and one does not automatically cancel out the other.
V
ENGLAND: Muslim Migrant Brutally Stabs 17 Year-Old Girl In the Neck In Broad Daylight
https://gellerreport.com/2026/
(Of course he did it in broad daylight – how else is he going to get an audience to witness his religious fervor – jlr)
and yet more from Britain and Ireland
https://x.com/tag4UK/status/
A 17 year old girl, walking down the street, stabbed in the throat.
A 49 year old man, walking his dog, repeatedly stabbed to death.
A 29 year old women, on her way home from work, stabbed 23 times with a screwdriver.
A 18 year old man, stabbed 5 times, died in handcuffs.
A 6 year old girl, a 7 year old girl, and a 9 year old girl, attending a dance party, stabbed over 200 times.
A 15 year old boy, stabbed 13 times, doused in petrol and burned alive.
A 44 year old man, slashed up, lost his eye, tried to cut his head off.
Federal Judge Knocks Down Trump’s Attempt to Put American Workers First
https://americanjournaldaily.
US District Judge Leo Sorokin ruled that the fee amounted to an unlawful tax…the H-1B visa program has been a golden ticket for corporations looking to undercut American talent with cheaper foreign labor. What started as a mechanism to fill genuine gaps in the workforce mutated into something uglier — a system that sidelines qualified U.S. employees in tech, engineering, healthcare, and education. Consider this: nearly three-quarters of all H-1B approvals go to workers from a single country, India. This isn’t supplementing the American workforce. It’s displacing it…
Western Governments Endanger Western Citizens
https://www.americanthinker.
The West is at war with foreign invaders, and Western governments are at war with imaginary ‘climate change.’
The global managerial class of bureaucrats, bankers, politicians, corporate heads, and NGOs are committed to fomenting chaos and violence in Western nations. In the name of fighting the imaginary “climate change” hobgoblin, they outlaw inexpensive forms of energy and push us toward a carbon-tracking system that justifies ever more intrusive forms of mass surveillance. In the name of fighting exotic pandemics, they justify mass lockdowns, central bank digital currencies, and “vaccine” passports. By claiming that man-made “climate change” causes new pandemics and by blaming Western industrialized societies for causing “climate change,” the global managerial class insists that Western nations must accept “climate refugees” as part of their rolling atonement for past industrial “sins.”
Homo Cosmopolitus Won’t Count the Costs
https://chrisbray.substack.
Another four-year term for a Los Angeles Democrat costs about 7,600 deaths.
The Only Ones: P.A.F.A.F.O.
https://miguelgg.substack.com/
You don’t play around with guns… unless you are “special.”…PASADENA, Calif. Officer Shot by Fellow Officer During “Horseplay,”…Any civilian would have been in jail within the hour. I believe these two will be reprimanded/suspended with pay or worse case fired…. only to be rehired somewhere else.
200,000 DEAD PEOPLE, USDA Uncovers 700,000 Food Stamp Fraudsters – BLUE STATES SUING TO KEEP THE SCAM ALIVE
https://gellerreport.com/2026/
…investigators found 200,000 people using dead Americans’ Social Security numbers and nearly 500,000 collecting benefits in multiple states, while some states refuse to share data…millions more fraudulent beneficiaries may be hidden in states resisting federal scrutiny…
video – 00:00:59 – https://twitter.com/i/status/
El Niño is coming. Changing weather is only part of the story.
https://www.collapselife.com/
Every few years, the Pacific Ocean starts behaving strangely and the rest of the world starts to feel it. That’s the simplest way to understand El Niño, which has been coming up in the news a lot lately, with a notable sky-is-falling bent…It’s a natural climate pattern that begins in the tropical Pacific, when sea surface temperatures become warmer than usual and disrupt normal wind and rainfall patterns. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) describes El Niño (and the similar La Niña) as a pattern that shifts irregularly every two to seven years and has global side effects.
Rediscovering the Wisdom of the Older Generation
https://www.thezenparent.com/
It’s easy to poke fun at the way older generations talk, but if you look past the vintage vibes, you’ll find that Baby Boomers actually nailed some pretty specific concepts. Their slang often captures a sentiment with a level of punchy directness that modern internet lingo sometimes misses. You might find yourself wanting to borrow a few of these gems once you realize how perfectly they fit into everyday life.
Hot Mic Moment Exposes Whitmer’s Attitude Toward Voters
https://integritypress.org/
Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer was caught on a hot mic at a $16 billion data center groundbreaking saying, “We’re used to people saying ‘f-ck no,’ and doing it anyway” — a stunning admission that local opposition simply doesn’t matter to her.
video – 00:00:12- https://x.com/TheFelix123/
Gun Manufacturer Bails on Virginia, Heads to Pro-Gun Georgia
https://bearingarms.com/
If the firearm industry is as massive as anti-gunners claim, then politicians should be wary about passing gun control. After all, even a little bit of it might be enough to drive the industry from your state entirely, taking jobs and other economic benefits with it…we’ve seen something of an exodus from many anti-gun states as companies decided to not just leave places hostile toward their businesses, but that are also trying to make it easier for them to be sued for the actions of third parties…with Virginia’s anti-gun cabal calling the shots in the Old Dominion State, at least one company has decided to move from there…Rideout Arsenal, the firearms designer and manufacturer launching the new facility, has announced it will be opening its doors in the South Georgia
Ruger shifts headquarters to North Carolina, cuts 100 jobs
https://www.msn.com/en-us/
Ruger confirmed it moved its headquarters from Connecticut to North Carolina, centralizing leadership near its largest manufacturing facility.
The relocation mirrors other gunmakers leaving Connecticut, citing regulatory challenges and shifting industry dynamics…Ruger’s relocation reflects a broader exodus of firearms companies from Connecticut, a state with a long gunmaking history but increasingly strict regulations since the 2012 Sandy Hook tragedy. Other firms, such as Stag Arms and PTR Industries, have previously moved to states with perceived friendlier business climates…Ruger was one of the last major legacy firearms brands still closely tied to the Northeast, even if actual manufacturing had left Connecticut years ago.
Democrat ActBlue CEO Invokes Fifth Amendment Over 20 Times in House Hearing
https://gellerreport.com/2026/
ActBlue is the Democratic Party political action committee, its largest fundraising platform founded in 2004. ActBlue is a major part of the Democratic Party’s fundraising infrastructure. As of 2025, ActBlue reports that it has raised $16 billion for Democratic candidates and causes since it was established.How much of their largesse is dirty money, laundered money? ActBlue has been a major cash cow for Democrats, with the PAC bringing in $568 million in Q1 2026 (ActBlue). Rep. Jim Jordan summarizes the hearing: ActBlue accepted foreign money and donations under fake names. They knew about it and failed to stop it. And when we asked them about it, they all took the 5th
Trump Pushes $350 Billion Military Bill with SAVE AMERICA ACT Election Security
https://gellerreport.com/2026/
President Trump just added the SAVE AMERICA ACT to his $350 billion Pentagon reconciliation package, which only needs a simple majority (50 votes plus VP Vance) to pass. It is only logical that election integrity be treated as a matter of national security. Without free and fair elections, a nation cannot survive. Likewise, without a strong military to defend our country and protect our unalienable rights, the republic is doomed. The ballot box and national defense are inseparable pillars of a free nation—if either falls, the country falls with it.
Portland’s “Peaceful Pacifist” Gets 2.5 Years for Throwing a Rock at an ICE Agent’s Head
https://americanjournaldaily.
Key Takeaways
Portland Antifa rioter Robert Hoopes received 30 months for hurling a rock at an ICE agent’s head.
Portland police never responded, leaving outnumbered federal agents to defend the facility alone.
Reed College fired the employee who helped the FBI identify the attacker.
Hoopes is only the second of 30+ defendants sentenced — the crackdown is just beginning.
The Karmelo Anthony Problem
https://pjmedia.com/aj-
There is a sickness in black subculture in contemporary America, and the sickness is this: Too many young black males are immersed in a socio-racial ideology that glorifies violence, preaches that only the meanest dog on the block wins, and dictates that any perceived threat from anyone who “steps up to me” must be countered with a wildly disproportionate, overwhelming response. With regards to this latter point, the sole purpose of a disproportionate, overwhelming response is to serve as a warning not only to the victim, but to whoever else is watching or who is later made aware of this incident. If pushing me results in me murdering you, people far and wide will think twice before “stepping up” to me. My reputation as an unpredictable, uncontrollable animal is forged and serves my interests in the long run, even if I’m punished in the short run.
This Is Not a Drill: These Democrat Freakshow Candidates Are a Threat to the Nation
https://pjmedia.com/
And suddenly a knife is not a deadly weapon.
https://miguelgg.substack.com/
The aftermath of the Karmelo Anthony conviction and sentencing is producing some wild legal re-definitions.
RETURN TO SENDER 
https://www.coffeeandcovid.
“Postal Service Issues Proposal to Block Mail Ballots in States That Don’t Turn Over Data.” The story referred to a new rule proposed last week by the U.S. Postal Service (but only covered now, since Democrats have realized the risk) that would require states to provide lists of eligible voters, along with unique barcodes, so that mail-in ballots can be processed and delivered. To the Democrats, this is a completely crazy idea that will literally destroy democracy itself. And it’s fascist.
GOING VIRAL 
https://www.coffeeandcovid.
The viral 2022 map that got a man branded a “fringe QAnon extremist” just got confirmed by the DNI
image address – https://substackcdn.com/image/
Britain Goes Full ‘Airstrip One’
https://www.zerohedge.com/
“Ministers are reportedly drafting a law that would force Apple, Google, and the rest to make it impossible for a child to send, receive, view, or share a single nude image, with the executives who refuse facing up to five years in prison.” That might sound all well and good, but as usual, For the Children™ is little more than the government’s justification for total surveillance.
WATCH: Feral Migrant UK ‘Enforcement Officers’ Threaten to Knock Out Civilian’s Teeth
In a viral video emanating out of the UK, two migrant “enforcement officers” (more on what that means in a moment) are seen threatening to knock out a civilian’s teeth after he begins recording their activities on the street in Harrow.
video – 00:01:01 – https://twitter.com/i/status/
who knew? – State Department Finds ‘Birth Tourism’ Networks Around the World Exploiting the U.S. – EVERONE with any intelligence, for decades
https://pjmedia.com/
A Leftist Judge Blocks ActBlue Lawsuit to Protect Democrat Candidates
https://pjmedia.com/matt-
Federal District Court Judge Richard Stearns handed ActBlue a get-out-of-jail-free card on Thursday, blocking Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton from pursuing a lawsuit against the Democrat fundraising platform. District Judge Richard Stearns decided the lawsuit was political. Specifically, Stearns concluded Paxton filed it to retaliate against ActBlue for raising money for his U.S. Senate opponent, James Talarico……There’s just one problem with that claim. Paxton’s investigation into ActBlue started in Dec. 2023. Talarico didn’t enter the Senate race until Sept. 2025. That’s nearly two years before the “political rival” Stearns claims Paxton was targeting even announced a candidacy. And the judge knows this, because his own ruling says so.
The Sad Karmelo Anthony Circus
Karmelo Anthony’s Defense in Tatters – Provoked Fight, Was Asked to Leave 15 Times, Wanted to Fight Say Witnesses
https://www.westernjournal.
In a stinging rebuke of race-hustlers who claim the murder case is being driven by “racism,” it turns out that four of the six witnesses who testified against Anthony are themselves black.
V
‘Only good cracker is a dead cracker’: Karmelo Anthony protests spark riot fears
https://www.theblaze.com/
video – 00:30:16 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Q: What if a guilty verdict sparks mass riots?
(Have the National Guard, the Texas State Guard, the Texas Rangers, State Troopers, and Police tactical units armed and on hot standby. IF a protest becomes a riot, send them in. RAPIDLY. IN FORCE. Cordon off the entire riot area and arrest anyone who is within the area; using whatever force or means necessary to stop the riot- you have the absolute civil right to peacefully protest – rioting/looting/arson/
V
Closing Arguments in the Karmelo Anthony Case
https://hotair.com/john-s-2/
V
BREAKING: We Have the Verdict in the Karmelo Anthony Murder Trial
https://pjmedia.com/matt-
The jury found Karmelo Anthony guilty of murder.
V
BREAKING: Karmelo Anthony Prison Sentence Announced, Roughly 4 Hours After Guilty Verdict Read
https://www.westernjournal.
After roughly two-and-a-half hours of deliberation, the jury reached a sentence of 35 years in prison for the 19-year-old Anthony.
V
Austin Metcalf’s Father Pounds Table and Unleashes on Karmelo Anthony in Courtroom: ‘Don’t Look Down’
westernjournal.com/austin-
V
Verdict in Karmelo Anthony case ignites outrage and bitter debate
https://www.bizpacreview.com/
V
Karmelo Anthony’s Lawyer Said What About the Guilty Verdict?
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/
“Pray for the Anthony family, because they have been legally lynched for the last year and moreso by this slaughterhouse of a courthouse, as well as the family of the Metcalfs.
The energy right now is very white supremacy. They have shown up to be the pigs that they display with hate. They are celebrating the loss of life and a loss of freedom.”
“We have an overzealous prosecutor who lied throughout this trial, who put on liars as witnesses in order to be a saving grace for the white community so that they can win an election.”
“What I heard from this man today is indicative of why it’s important that it’s people that look like us that are in courtrooms like that. This man disregarded human life the entire trial. He invoked race. He equated Dallas County as being the ghetto opposed to Frisco being safe.
They propaganda’d a photo of the deceased with black people around praying, saying, ‘This is community.’ They used us as a prop in order to pitch their lynching.
This man has been known to be an overzealous prosecutor when it comes to us. He see[s] us as free labor. That’s what he see[s] us as. So I’m not surprised that this prosecutor who has unethical background would get up there and ask for the max [sentence] when he know that this was self-defense.”
V
We Now Know What Karmelo Anthony’s Knife Looked Like, and It Was No Quaint Leatherman Multitool
https://www.westernjournal.
Race-hustling apologists for convicted murderer Karmelo Anthony beclowned themselves by insisting that the knife Anthony used to kill high school track star Austin Metcalf was not a “deadly weapon” because it looked like a Swiss Army Knife multitool… when a crime is committed by a white person involving a non-white victim, the incident is immediately treated as a “racist hate crime” committed by a “white supremacist.” (by liberals – jlr)…This sickening double standard demonizes and dehumanizes white people and infantilizes black people
Thanks to local reporter J.D. Miles, we do know what the knife looked like. – https://x.com/jdmiles11/
pic address – https://x.com/jdmiles11/
V
The Verdict Was Never the Point
https://michaelsmith.substack.
Motivated reasoning turns criminal trials into proxy wars and erodes trust in the institutions that hold American society together
The difficulty is that once a criminal trial becomes a symbolic political event, the facts of the case frequently become secondary to the story that people decided to tell before the trial even began.
V
Outrageous: Black Advocates Move to Have Austin Metcalf’s Brother Arrested, Charged as Accessory to Murder
https://www.westernjournal.
Karmelo Anthony’s Family Can No Longer Fundraise Off Austin Metcalf’s Death
https://www.zerohedge.com/
‘Terrifying if that is true’: Glenn Beck reveals the chilling reality the Karmelo Anthony trial just exposed
https://www.theblaze.com/
“If evidence does come out that Karmelo was not in fact fighting for his life when he stabbed and killed Austin Metcalf, do you think that the black community will accept that?”…“No, we going to stand by ours regardless,” she said, acknowledging that the trial “is about race.”…“They want you to ignore that Anthony was asked to leave 15 times, that he put his hand into the bag and dared them. He said, ‘I’m not leaving. F you all,’” he continues. “They want outrage; they don’t want evidence. Division, not truth.”…“a jury of your peers doesn’t mean people who look like you.” “It does mean this: citizens who can set aside their bias — racial, political, cultural — and weigh the evidence with integrity,”…“Perhaps we think that the juror needs to look like us because we don’t think people of other color hold the same values, and that is terrifying if that is true,”
V
https://www.facebook.com/reel/
The Karmelo Anthony Problem
https://pjmedia.com/aj-
…There is a sickness in black subculture in contemporary America, and the sickness is this: Too many young black males are immersed in a socio-racial ideology that glorifies violence, preaches that only the meanest dog on the block wins, and dictates that any perceived threat from anyone who “steps up to me” must be countered with a wildly disproportionate, overwhelming response. With regards to this latter point, the sole purpose of a disproportionate, overwhelming response is to serve as a warning not only to the victim, but to whoever else is watching or who is later made aware of this incident. If pushing me results in me murdering you, people far and wide will think twice before “stepping up” to me. My reputation as an unpredictable, uncontrollable animal is forged and serves my interests in the long run, even if I’m punished in the short run…
From Behind Enemy Lines: Taxing the Super Rich
The big noise I hear from the Left is, trickle down economics don’t work. They cite a lot of stuff (Grok can give you a whole explanation, if you care to read it), mostly that cutting corporate tax rates doesn’t stimulate the economy because corporations then invest or spend the money on their executives, and that it “exacerbates inequality.” While I can agree with the idea that a good, effective fiscal policy should include incentives, fiscal sustainability, and broad opportunities rather than just trickle down, I don’t want to throw away the baby with the bathwater.
I look at the shenanigans going on in New York right now, and I can see that at least SOME trickle down works. It seems Mamdani was expecting the “rich folk” to stay and pay exorbitant taxes. When they left, their trickle stopped, and now Mamdani is upset. He ran on the idea of free childcare, free buses, and a bunch of other “free” stuff. The problem, of course, is that none of those things are free. They all require the work of other people, something socialists tend to forget about when they calculate how much to pay for things. Someone’s labor is worth dollars.
Now, please understand me… The person flipping your burgers is giving you labor, too, and that person is worth dollars. Right now, it appears that most people agree (and more importantly, the corporate overlords agree) that their worth is about $15 per hour. That appears, at least for now, to be sustainable for McDonald’s, Wendy’s, and the other burger conglomerates. This is (at least in my state, where the legal minimum wage is $7.25/hr) a decent wage for someone working in food service. Having worked at a McDonald’s in my youth, I can tell you that the training is excellent, the work is hard and exhausting, and the take home pay isn’t too bad. For a youth it’s excellent, and for a young adult it’s truly a living wage if you’re working full time.
One of the big issues I have with some capitalists is that they don’t appear to value the labor of those who are “below” them… the burger flippers, the guy who cleans the bed pans, the gal who greases the gears at the factory. Now, I’m not saying that low skill jobs should be paid the same as high skilled ones (whatever the skill may be). Making burgers is not nearly as complicated as making precision ball bearings (one of the local companies that hires young adults in my area of the world makes these, and provides training AND education to their workers, so that they can improve and better themselves while also doing a good job). Making precision ball bearings with a machine is not as complicated as making a plane engine. Making a plane engine isn’t even close to being as complex as making a rocket engine. And so on. There are tiers, and multiple factors do need to be taken into account… not the least of which is the idea of whether anyone would be anything but mildly inconvenienced by the disappearance of said job. If burgers stopped being made, people would eat at home, and probably gripe less and lose some weight. If precision ball bearings were to stop being made, planes would cease to fly in the sky, and many of our very important machines would stop working. And so on. Some jobs are worth more than others (which, I will also add, is not the same as saying the people in those jobs are worth more or less), simply due to their nature.
But I digress. We were talking about taxing the rich. Oh… no, taxing the ultra-rich. So here’s the thing: the rich (millionaires, for instance) are not the middle class they once were. Largely, they are not paying as much as they did. The ultra-rich (the billionaires, and our one trillionaire) are paying considerably more than their fair share of taxes in the world. Of course, that depends on what you consider fair. Some on the Left consider a 90% tax rate to be perfectly fair of a share. I do not.
In our country, the rich and the ultra-rich pay a lot. “High-income earners contribute the vast majority of U.S. federal income taxes. The top 10% of earners pay roughly 71% of all individual income taxes, while the top 1% alone accounts for approximately 38%. Overall, the top 50% of taxpayers contribute over 96% of the total income tax burden.” (NTUF) A few years ago, Elon Musk paid over $11 BILLION dollars in taxes, which is equal to 0.15% of our country’s budget. A single man. I think that’s considerably more than his fair share.
Now go look at the image above. By making the numbers look incomprehensible (and yeah, they ARE incomprehensible except for a few math geniuses), they make it scary. That makes it easier to get their ideology across. They present it in such a way that it sounds like a) the super rich are not working people, b) that taxing the super rich doesn’t affect other working people, c) that not taxing the super rich means you’re not investing in working people, and that d), all of this means our democracy will die. Because we didn’t tax the ultra-rich.
Fear is a great motivator. Part of the problem we’re seeing now is that, even when people on the Left start to figure out that they’re being duped, the fear kicks in. It’s incredibly motivating. I still get caught in some of the fear traps the Left tosses out, until I go investigate. The problem, of course, is that a single human being simply cannot investigate all of these things. Even doing a few is exhausting and draining.
In the same way Trump overwhelmed the Left’s social media machine in the first few months of his Presidency, by simply being a few steps ahead and tossing out media land mines as he moved, he was able to make certain they were always hours or days behind. By the time they caught onto something, he was already three memes ahead. Well, they’re doing that with fear. They’re chumming the waters of social media with fear bombs. Yes, I can look some up and dismiss them. But I just don’t have TIME to look them all up. And just enough of them have the potential to be real (or have portions of them that are based in reality) that you can’t just write them all off. So what’s a girl to do?
I rely on media that I trust, which is hard, because I just went through the whole “the entire media is lying to me” lesson. But I … trust but verify. When I can. And when I can’t, I move on.
So here’s the thing I keep reminding myself of. Our parents and grandparents and greats, they didn’t have access to the news we have. They lived very different lives, and in some ways, very much happier lives. The problems they had, they didn’t have to do with Iran or Iraq, or mass shootings, or kids eating Tide pods. The reason was, they didn’t KNOW about those things. They only knew what they read in the paper, and unlike the internet, the paper only has so much space. Only the most interesting and useful news goes into them. All the petty stuff? You might occasionally get a special edition on a Sunday that dealt with it, but not everyone read the Sunday paper for just that reason.
So I limit how much “news” I read. I can’t vet it all, so I only read what I can vet. I don’t stress out if I don’t know everything. I share interesting news at breakfast with the family, and they share their interesting stuff. Each of us likes different things, so we get a nice cross-section of the available news of the hour. It’s enough.
And when people ask why I’m not outraged over the fact that the ultra-rich aren’t being taxed until they decide to play Gatsby and stop working altogether? I tell them I don’t know those things, because I’m reenacting or sewing or working in my garden. M’kay, thanks.
Servers and Tips
A (Right leaning) friend posted this image on FB yesterday. I decided to comment:The Intermittent Missive – June 1-6
FBI Busts NIH Scientists Smuggling Live Monkeypox Through U.S. Airport
https://dailyheadlines.com/
Two NIH researchers were charged June 2 with smuggling 113 vials of monkeypox from a Congo outbreak on a commercial flight and lying to federal agents about it. Both men work in NIH’s highest-security BSL-4 lab, reserved for research on the most dangerous known and potential human pathogens on Earth, and Munster runs the entire Virus Ecology Section.
rcd via e-mail
Watch “Spencer Pratt’s New Commercial Just Won Him The Election.” on YouTube
video – 00:01:51 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?
The ending is the best part.
Trump’s New Election Order Creates Mail-Ballot Chain of Custody — And Ballot Mills Are Panicking
https://gellerreport.com/2026/
Iran’s President Asks To Resign, Citing Total Takeover By IRGC Commanders
https://gellerreport.com/2026/
Iran’s president has reportedly asked to resign, citing a loss of authority inside the country’s ruling system.
MAiD in America – More and more US states are getting on board with ‘death by doctor.’
https://www.americanthinker.
In the United States, almost one third of Americans will live where doctors can “assist” a person who wants to die because of their terminal medical ailment. On August 5, 2026, an “aid in dying” bill will take effect in New York State. A similar law will take effect in Illinois in September. When that happens, 13 states plus the District of Columbia will legally allow the medical profession to help kill the dying…About three-quarters of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents see physician-assisted death as morally acceptable (43%) or as a moral nonissue (33%). By comparison, only about half of Republicans and GOP leaners take those positions. Republicans are twice as likely as Democrats to call the practice morally wrong (48% vs. 23%).
Islamists are here, and with deadly intent – Islam is fundamentally, violently incompatible with Western Civilization.
https://www.americanthinker.
…the Muslim Brotherhood is determined “that Islam should be ‘given hegemony over all matters of life.” To accomplish that, the Brother’s credo states:
“God is our objective, the Koran is our Constitution, the Prophet is our leader, struggle [jihad] is our way, and death for the sake of God is the highest of our aspirations.”
CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, postures as a non-violent advocacy group, but as Discover The Networks explains, it’s anything but:
CAIR promotes a radical Islamic vision, as evidenced by the fact that its co-founder Omar Ahmad told a Fremont, California audience in July 1998: “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran … should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.”
Sigh…When you’re losing, blame somebody else…
https://oldnfo.substack.com/p/
Texas Democratic Senate nominee James Talarico said he believes state laws have stacked the deck against him as he looks to become the first Democrat to win statewide office since 1994…he’s claiming the deck is stacked against him, since illegals aren’t allowed to vote legally in Texas.
V
Talarico makes stunning claim about why he thinks Texas elections aren’t ‘free and fair’ – Talarico ‘wants illegal aliens to vote in our elections’
https://www.foxnews.com/
embedded video – 00:01:00
Antifa terrorizes city meeting during motion to recognize Antifa as terror group
https://notthebee.com/article/
Breaking: The City of Battle Ground, Washington, has signed a proclamation officially recognizing the federal government’s designation of Antifa as a terrorist organization. Antifa members interrupt Mayor Overholser, resulting in removal and an arrest.
video – 00:03:53 – https://twitter.com/i/status/
Massachusetts police respond to call about man in camo with bazooka, find landscaper with leaf blower instead
https://notthebee.com/article/
Hopefully, Bridgewater Police made sure this caller was alright … and banned them from calling the department ever again.
Seattle’s $116,000 smart restroom vandalized two weeks after installation
https://notthebee.com/article/
video – 00:01:45 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Anti-Gun Activist Admits the Endgame: Ending U.S. Gun Production
https://txgunrights.org/anti-
Anti-gun activist Seth Sandronsky recently argued that the focus should shift to American gun production itself. In other words, the problem is not just who buys firearms, how they are transferred, or what paperwork is required. The problem…is that firearms are being made in the United States at all.
Cleveland Official Wants to Ban Gun-Shaped Lighters
https://bearingarms.com/
…this is just another official trying to grab headlines and attention over what sure looks like a non-issue.
Over 800,000 Inactive Voters on the Rolls in California
https://gellerreport.com/2026/
Samsung moving its U.S. headquarters to Plano
https://www.fox4news.com/news/
Everything’s bigger in Texas — including Fortune 500 headquarters. State leads nation with 57
https://www.wfaa.com/article/
The latest Fortune 500 list puts Texas on top, with Dallas-Fort Worth home to many of the companies driving the state’s economic clout.
Iran Strikes Kuwaiti International Airport, Kills One Dozens Wounded
https://gellerreport.com/2026/
The most egregious ceasefire violation to date. How long are we allow this bullshit?
‘Islamophobic’ Killer Is Identified — And Shocka! He’s Muslim
https://pjmedia.com/robert-
But this story reinforces the cardinal rule: when you hear a story about “Islamophobia” being perpetrated, never, ever take it at face value.
Rubio Rips Deranged Democrats During Appearance Before House Foreign Affairs Committee, ‘Is This a Circus?’
https://gellerreport.com/2026/
CHEATING IN CALIFORNIA: Dems Trying to Steal Election Results, Percentage Counted Drops, Democrat Ballot Dump Changes Race, Trump Announces Investigation
https://gellerreport.com/2026/
Karmelo Anthony’s Murder Trial Just Started and It’s Already a Circus
https://dailyheadlines.com/
More than 14 months after Austin Metcalf was stabbed to death at a Frisco track meet, the man charged with his murder finally faced a jury Thursday as opening statements began in one of the most racially charged criminal cases in Texas history…The trial is expected to last up to two weeks. Prosecutors have 35 witnesses on their list. Anthony faces up to life in prison if convicted…
rcd via email
Senate Democrats Demand Government Stop Minting Gold Coin With Trump On It
https://www.mediaite.com/
(you can’t make this uo, it is just too stupid – jlr) Two Democratic senators have written to the U.S. Mint to urge the institution to halt production of ******gold coins with President Donald Trump on them, citing the possibility that the gold is from cartel-owned mines…“We request that the U.S. Mint halt all production of the 250th anniversary 24-karat Trump gold coin and conduct a public supply chain audit to ensure coins are not composed of illicit cartel-linked gold,”
RINO TRAITORS: Senate Kills Voter ID Bill One Day After California Election Chaos
https://gellerreport.com/2026/
Republican NO votes: Tillis, Murkowski, McConnell, and Collins.





