Portrait of a young businessman with finger on his lips

Clearances

Every piece of information the government or military processes has a classification level assigned to it.

Currently, the federal government lists four levels of clearances that are associated with classification levels.

The other level is “No Clearance”.

Information that is classified as “Confidential” could cause damage to national security if disclosed. Note the weasel word “could”. The definition will often add “without authorization”.

This is the “lowest” classification. There are really two other levels below this.

There is For Official Use Only (FOUO) which is sometimes called Sensitive Unclassified.

This is information that anybody working at a government site might be exposed to. It may not carry any markings. So if you were to see a list of SSN, you don’t have to be told that those are Sensitive Unclassified or FOUO.

This is the same in the health care industry or data processing industry. By this, I mean that there are laws in place that protect people from sharing my personal information. My doctor can’t share my health information. I can’t share your name or email information, if I collect it via a credit card payment.

This doesn’t mean that people aren’t stupid. At one government installation I used to work at, they had a recycling program for paper. You could take used printer paper home to use for projects and stuff. Think of using it in the bottom of a bird cage.

The head of the installation put an end to it when he picked up something at a local shop, wrapped in used paper. The paper was from the installation and had SSN plus wages printed on it.

By the time I got to the installation, we had industrial shredders. Every piece of paper that would have gone in the garbage was fed through the shredders.

What does this mean in terms of the DOGE team? If they are properly employed and tasked to do the work they are doing, they have all the clearances they need to see FOUO and Sensitive, Unclassified material. They don’t need a clearance to see and work with that data.

As soon as we move to information that is classified, certain things become true. First, it is supposed to be marked.

This is one of the issues with the Hilary emails. She had information on her private server that had no markings, which came from classified sources. Those classified sources were marked.

In addition, she was informed that the source of that information was classified, and the information was classified, regardless of markings.

In other words, if I observe a weapons test and I see something that I know is or will be classified, I must treat it as classified. Even if it is not “marked”.

So information is classified. It is classified by level. Just because you have a clearance, it doesn’t mean that you have access to the information.

You must also have a need to know.

I, personally, got racked over the coals by one Army Officer and then got to watch our security officer rake him over the coals. The difference being that the Army Officer could have had lots worse happen to him.

He was in an area that implied he had a clearance. I knew he had a clearance. I even knew what level he had. It was higher than mine, at the time. He asked to see some classified information and I refused.

For this, I was raked over the coals by this officer. I told him that I had to have confirmation from my security officer that he had a need to know.

He stormed out, came back with my security officer. He explained. The security dude asked if the officer had it right. I said “yep.” The security dude then ripped the officer a new one.

The army officer had to have a need to know. He did. But I don’t get to make that determination. Only authorized people can do that. One such authorized person was my security officer.

Above Confidential is Secret, above that is Top Secret, and above that is Top Secret, Sensitive Compartmented Information.

To be granted any clearance, you need to be vetted. That requires you to fill out several invasive forms. These are then used to start a background check. How through these background checks are depends on the level of clearance being requested.

Your clearance doesn’t belong to you. It belongs to the entity that wants you to have a clearance. That entity must have a clearance. The entity requests that you be granted a clearance. Your entity then gets the paperwork from you which is then handed over to the investigators.

When you are granted your clearance, your entity will be informed. Your entity will have a security officer at the least and may have an entire office dedicated to handling clearances.

My entity was Cray Research. Once their security office was informed I had received my clearance, they informed the security office where I was employed. At that point, I had a clearance. And nobody would have given me a bit of classified information.

The people I worked directly with were told I had a clearance by their security office. The people I worked indirectly with I told. They then verified with their security office.

When I left that government installation, my clearance still existed. It was “owned” by Cray Research. My clearance didn’t mean anything because I wasn’t at a government installation.

When I went to different government locations, where I had a need to know, my security people sent the proper security magic to the locations where I was going. This allowed me to see what I had a need to see.

When I left Cray Research, my clearance still existed. Cray Research no longer owned it. Somebody in the government had control over it.

When I joined a different company, they put in a request for my clearance, and it was granted because it already existed.

Ok. Done with me.

What this means is that the people that DOGE is using could have had clearances because of other projects they had worked. When they started working for DOGE, their clearances were either transferred to DOGE or their entity informed DOGE of what clearances they had.

So this nice young man of 20 or so wants to inspect a computer system at CFPB. The administration says, “Hell no, you don’t have the clearances to see our systems because you might see our data.”

The young man calls his security office and has them transmit the clearances to CFPB security. “Call your security office, they will verify that I have the clearances to access the systems and the data.”

The administrator, having lost the first battle, says, “You don’t have a need to know.”

The young man presents the orders he has been given him by the boss of CFPB and that is satisfied, after verification.

That’s how clearances work.

Now, the current NPC talking point is that this young man is unelected, reports to Elon, and as such will access data he shouldn’t and then use it or leak it.

When you hear this, you should translate it to: “Are you saying the FBI and other agencies can’t do a background check? That this young man with clearances shouldn’t have them? What agency or person are you accusing of granting a clearance to somebody that can’t be trusted?”

Yeah, I’ve about had it with Democratic(NPC) talking points.


Comments

5 responses to “Clearances”

  1. CBMTTek Avatar
    CBMTTek

    “Now, the current NPC talking point is that this young man is unelected, reports to Elon, and as such will access data he shouldn’t and then use it or leak it.”

    I had a bit of a back and forth with someone of that mindset. They were convinced DOGE was going to access all types of personal information, and share it worldwide.
    .
    I asked him to tell me why he thought the average Federal employee was such an angel. That they were incapable of accessing information they should not, and leaking it publicly.
    No answer.
    .
    There is an assumption that the DOGE people are somehow not trustworthy, whereas some faceless drone with an official badge is a paragon of virtue. That assumption is baseless.
    .
    Take a look around you next time you are in the office. (this fails for remote workers…) Would you trust any of your coworkers with your private info? Most folks will say “Not a chance.” But, they will trust someone they have never even seen without question with the same data.

  2. Tom from WNY Avatar
    Tom from WNY

    The Progressive Drones screeching about DOGE have a vested interest in doing so; their routine infusion of our money (paycheck).

    They operate in a compartmentalized environment, concerned only about minimally meeting the requirements of their job description. They answer to their Higher Masters & Commanders, the Progressive Elites.

    When Musk selected his team, integrity and performance was the criteria he used. I’m sure they understood the mission and have the proper clearances to perform the task.

    Task: Auditing where our Citizen Taxpayer dollars are spent.

  3. pkoning Avatar
    pkoning

    The “need to know” bit seems to be ignored all too often, especially in the most serious breaches. The Manning case comes to mind, and the analogous case more recently in MA involving some National Guard flunky who somehow had access to vast bodies of classified material.

    1. I always wondered in those cases if the “need to know” thing was handled more-or-less on the honor system. Like, “You have the clearance but you don’t need to know. Don’t go digging, pretty please with cherries on top?”

      Why wasn’t all this information compartmentalized so they couldn’t access anything they didn’t need to know? It’s not that hard. Or are we to believe these low-level NG Private flunkies all have S00p3r-L33t H4x0r Sk1llz to bypass all the safeguards and get things they shouldn’t?

  4. As usual, the Democrat NPCs are freaking out and creating talking points about something they don’t understand.

    Every piece of government information is “classified” (small c), in the “sorted into groups” sense, the way a mushroom is “classified” as a fungus. Some of it is “Classified” (capital C) and access is restricted to people with heightened security clearances and a “need to know”.

    I have no doubt that the DOGE auditors are making all their current recommendations using their existing security clearances or (even better) based on publicly available, FOUO, and Sensitive Unclassified information for which no clearance is needed.

    (And as I understand it, “making recommendations” is all they do; DOGE is an advisory board, it has no power except to audit, investigate, and make recommendations. The ultimate decision does not lie with the auditors, or with Elon, but with Trump, who as President DOES have the power and authority to direct executive agencies and withhold funding.)

    I also have no doubt that the DOGE auditors have the paperwork for increased security clearances in process. Until it gets investigated and cleared, they’re hitting the ground running using whatever information they can currently access, until such time as they can access more.

    IOW, the audits will get deeper and more sensitive as time passes and the security checks are cleared.

    As for the Leftist’s stated fears about unelected, implied-untrustworthy people having access to government information, let me tell a short story:

    Once upon a time my workplace had an in-house application. It was siloed and ran independent of the SSO network authentication, and as such did not use the same login credentials as everything else. It had its own set of admins and sub-admins to manage accounts, passwords, and password resets.

    The chief admin for this application did not want the Help Desk people to have access to change user passwords, citing fears that HD wouldn’t know what they’re doing and could cause a lot of problems mucking around.

    This line of argument always rang hollow with me. After all, this is the same HD who routinely fields account lockout, disable, and reactivation requests and password resets for literally everything else on the network, and somehow doesn’t botch things up. But the managers listened to the chief admin, and so login issues for this one single application had to be redirected to a list of sub-admins. (And Heaven forbid any of them was out sick or on vacation if a user locked themselves out.)

    I never said so, but to me it always sounded like the chief admin for this application was more worried about losing the power and control — and the justification for keeping their position as chief admin — than anything they said about “outsiders” having access to the user accounts.

    That’s what the Leftist complaints about DOGE sound like to me. It’s not that they’re really worried about “unelected” auditors having access to the information; unelected bureaucrats already do, so that argument falls flat. Unelected IRS auditors can access every single American’s income and tax information — and always have — and they’re not complaining about that!

    What they’re really worried about is the loss of power and control, from independent auditors who aren’t on their side.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *