Hearing Protection Act

I am NOT a good source of information about the HPA. I’m not even sure the “A” stands for “Act”.

That said, repeating what I’ve read and heard from people I respect and follow:

The HPA removes suppressors from the NFA. This means they are no longer regulated under the NFA. No tax stamps, no registering them, no “extended” background check. No need for chief law enforcement permission. That is all gone.

The GCA would still consider them firearms and require a 4473 to purchase them.

This means purchasing a suppressor becomes just as easy as picking up another Glock or Sig.

State laws might (will) vary.

If the Senate were to pull the HPA or there are not enough votes, then the HPA can go away, but there is still an amendment to reduce the cost of registering from $200 to $0.

All the rest of the bullshit remains, but that $200 savings isn’t something to stick your nose up at.

I’m eagerly awaiting the day when I can start experimenting with cans. Of course, there is a boat load to learn about making a suppressor, I’m not sure how a booster works.


Comments

2 responses to “Hearing Protection Act”

  1. It's just Boris Avatar
    It’s just Boris

    Start with rifle cans, that way you don’t need a Nielson device (booster) from the get-go. And if you start with cans for a .22LR you can get by with aluminum for the most part.

    1. curby Avatar

      I have a couple cans my dad designed in the 80s. when I got my FFL I put them together. one is on an M1 carbine and one was designed for .30 cal but I use it on a .22 rifle. to me suppressors are as much fun as full auto stuff.
      I have a can my buddy made for my .45 carbine. 94db at 5 ft on a 5 inch barrel carbine. made from a 3 cell maglight..

Leave a Reply to curby Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *