The Great Flip, V2.0

Not so much “behind enemy lines” today, as a mental dump.

There is a belief that the Republican and Democratic parties did an ideological flip around 1932 (with FDR). Some people claim it’s a fact, and others are less sure about that. Regardless, we know that Lyndon B. Johnson said his famous line in 1964: “I’ll have those niggers voting Democrat for the next 200 years.” He was wrong. It was less than a hundred years. Thank you, Pres. Trump.

For all I dislike Johnson, he did say a few things that really hit home right now (obviously gleaned from some MUCH less savory quotes):

  • [T]he vote is the most powerful instrument ever devised by man for breaking down injustice and destroying the terrible walls which imprison men because they are different from other men.
  • If we stand passively by while the center of each city becomes a hive of deprivation, crime and hopelessness…if we become two people, the suburban affluent and the urban poor, each filled with mistrust and fear for the other…then we shall effectively cripple each generation to come.
  • Until justice is blind to color, until education is unaware of race, until opportunity is unconcerned with the color of men’s skins, emancipation will be a proclamation but not a fact.

These words, if they were the only words he’d said, are good words. It’s a shame that he sullied them by making so many other horrid statements.

Regardless, that brings me to today. I believe we’re seeing another shift of the party ideologies. Trump is at the helm, and many of us (still sounds odd to me to say that) are supporting him and his goals. He wants to drain the swamp, fix the financing, get us out of debt, stop us being the world’s police, and much more. They’re noble dreams, and I hope many or all of them come to fruition.

They’re also the dreams that belonged more to the Left of a decade ago. I watch some of the really old GOP folks getting their panties in a bunch over Trump’s takeover of the Republican party, and I have to smile. Being “on the inside” now, I can see more of what he’s doing. Let’s face it… Trump was considered a Dem until a little under a decade ago. There’s a reason Hilary didn’t have any issues with him running on the Republican ticket. She figured if she lost, if the Dems lost, they’d STILL have a Dem in the White House. Little did they know that Trump actually stuck to his moral guns. Shocking, I know. He took his campaign promises seriously.

Back in the 60s, race and ethnicity wasn’t as much of a party talking point as it is today. Instead, it was regional. Places down south, both parties were less inclined to be happy about the Civil Rights Act. Up north, the politicians were considerably more supportive, again on both sides of the aisle. We managed, for a brief moment (which is a different moment in different regions, unfortunately for history, making it hard to track), to have actual equality. The color of someone’s skin didn’t matter. And then the great pendulum swung again, and suddenly things were moving hastily in the other direction. Instead of helping black and brown people to stand up and be contributing members of society, there was instead a call to appease those black and brown people. There were calls for reparations, and demands that more black and brown people be hired, regardless of their education or intelligence.

This has always struck me as being incredibly damaging. While it might have been important (I’m still on the fence about it) to “force” schools and businesses to accept black people for a single generation (ie about 20 years), to continue it beyond that was no longer helpful. Instead, it was reinforcing the idea that people who weren’t white were somehow damaged goods. They were so under educated or bad or stupid or slow that they required special hiring laws that applied only to them. And the proof is all around us. Simply look at the current state of affairs in most cities and larger towns. Blacks are self-segregating, choosing to live apart from the greater society of the United States. It’s easier to live as “a black man in America” than to live as “an American.” Generally speaking, people will always take the easier way out.

For a long time, the Dems have been the (at least apparent) champions of civil rights and freedoms. The Republicans were clinging to the old rules, and in the case of the really old GOP, still are. Sort of,”if it was good enough for my grand pappy, then it’s good enough for me.” But with Trump coming into power, that is changing. The people that are at the forefront of the Republican party are people who are (sorry to say for those who care about such things) downright progressive. Don’t believe me? Look at Trump’s own campaign promises:

  • release classified and redacted records on Kennedy and Martin Luther King’s assassinations
  • fix education so it actually educates rather than indoctrinates
  • pull out of global pacts that do nothing
  • work on fixing the cost of living
  • work on fixing the cost of energy
  • root out the Deep State and those who are practicing crony capitalism
  • make sure people coming to the United States are interested in freedom and liberty
  • encourage manufacturing here in America to help Americans
  • lowering taxes on average and low income Americans

Not every one of those has been completed, but near as I can tell, he’s at least attempted to get stuff moving on all of them. There are more, but I figure you all know about them. These are the kinds of campaign promises I would have expected out of a Democrat in the 1980s, folks. And now they’re coming out of Trump, on the Right.

If that weren’t enough proof, look at who’s come over: Elon Musk, Tulsi Gabbard, Robert Kennedy Jr…. I mean, come on folks. If a Kennedy joins your party, you’ve GOT to be progressive. And we are. Here on the Right, we’re getting progressive. For the longest time, that was the darling of the left, to be progressive. No longer. While the Left is struggling with defining a woman, the Right is protecting women, encouraging freedom of thought and expression, and pushing for less interventions and more inventions. Sure, there are some parts that haven’t quite caught up (the current fear of vaccines comes to mind, along with the fear of nuclear energy), but I have faith it’ll all come around.

I believe that 50 years from now, the history books will record this as another shift of the ideologies of the parties. I don’t think it’s a bad thing at all.


Comments

6 responses to “The Great Flip, V2.0”

  1. Tom from WNY Avatar
    Tom from WNY

    Interesting perspective on Progressive ideas, Allyson.

    Overall I agree with what you said regarding party philosophical paradigms.

    1. There’s a lot going on. I know Chris doesn’t agree 100% with what I said, but he gets the gist of it. And here’s the rub; I don’t have to agree with 100% of anything *anyone* says on this side of the aisle. I’m allowed to hold opinions of my own. 😉

  2. Anyone with half a functioning brain cell and a minute or two of spare time to glance through a history book could tell you that democrats have NEVER been in favor of liberty for most Americans. That’s not to say that the GOP is much better, but the dems have ALWAYS been worse.

    1. Derp, I forgot to mention in my first comment that the vaunted Civil Rights Act you talked about was passed by REPUBLICANS, with the demonrats doing anything and everything in their power to stop it up until LBJ (may his wicked soul burn in Hell forever) realized that the smooth brained welfare NPCs would vote for the Grand Wizard himself as long as they were getting paid.

  3. CBMTTek Avatar
    CBMTTek

    Things are cyclical, no different with poltiics.

    “For a long time, the Dems have been the (at least apparent) champions of civil rights and freedoms.”

    I am not going to dispute that statement, but I do want to make an observation.
    The Democrats were considered the liberals, and the Republicans the conservatives. Generally… that meant to the average person, the Democrats were about personal liberties and freedom. “Do and be what you want.” was the marketing message. Whereas, Conservatives were accused (and still are) of wanting religion to rule, and women should be barefoot and pregnant, etc… etc… etc..

    However, upon further examination, and as the past two decades has shown, the Democrats tolerance only extends to the point you do something they do not like. Religious tolerance extended to everyone but Christians as an example. And, this was just as true in the 60s as it was in the 00s. The only difference is the ease of spreading the message.

    The conservatives, on the other hand, really are the live and let live people. They do not really care what you do, or who you are, as long as it does not impact them directly. Want to be gay, be gay. Want to home school, fine, go ahead. Want to drive a massive gas guzzler, that is your call. There are obviously exceptions, but it was almost always that way. (Oh, and the Priests/Evangelists/Religious folks that get all bent out of shape over homosexuality tend to be the liberal/leftists.)

  4. There are different viewpoints on the whole thing, but I stand by what I said. It’s also why I said “the APPARENT champions” in my post. That’s the position they’ve taken. It’s my very strong personal opinion, one which I hold because I have Been There and Done That, is that the average liberal does actually care about personal liberty. What they don’t understand is how they’re being manipulated as a whole to promote something that isn’t actually liberty. I’ve been told that communism is “the ultimate liberty” by several folks over the past couple of years, and I just don’t get that particular one at all.

    In any case, when I talk with the folks that I know (admittedly a self-selected and therefore biased group), I see people who for the most part are very much interested in seeing everyone free to do whatever they want. The problem they run into is when they bump into what someone else wants to do conflicting with their want. For example, they don’t want to be forced to bear children to term, but the baby has a right to be born and other folks are standing “In loco parentis” for the fetus. Or when they want to have gay folks be treated just like everyone else, but their leadership want to push it into gay folks being special and needing special treatment, they get push back from the Right because no one deserves special treatment. We’re all just Americans. The rules have to apply to everyone, or they’re bad rules and need to be fixed.

    Of course, you do run into people on the Right who have issues with that last one, once in a while. They aren’t the majority (at least at this point in history), but they’re there. They would be the folks who felt that “having religion in the classroom was okay” until I agreed whole heartedly and sent my kid to school with a beautifully bound copy of the Wiccan Rede. I belong to the “all or nothing” school of what’s allowed in public schools. If you want religion, it has to be all religion or none, or you run afoul of the establishment clause. “None” works for me. I don’t have a problem keeping my religion out of schools. Religion is for me and my clergy to teach to my kids. I wouldn’t want a teacher doing it… they might get it wrong. 🙂 But of course, that’s me.

    But as is said above, they ARE the minority on the right. I used to think they were a minority on the Left, but I’ve become disillusioned about that. I am a bit confused over the comment that the priests who get bent over being gay are liberal… that doesn’t *appear* to be the case to me (meaning it doesn’t match my personal experience, which is obviously limited).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *