What the SOT, over.

I am not a lawyer, I am not an FFL, I don’t hold an SOT. Do NOT use anything I say in this article as reliable.

Having given you that warning, I want to talk about FFL and SOT for a bit.

There was a time, prior to 1968, when people were able to purchase firearms like any other good or commodity. If your local bar wanted to sell guns, they could. If the local hardware store wanted to sell guns, they could. If you were a large mail order company, you too could sell guns.

The only real requirement was that you had to pay a transfer tax on NFA items.

The government decided that it was too dangerous to allow just anybody to sell guns. They set up federal firearm licenses and federal firearm licensees. If you had an FFL, you could still buy guns the way you always could.

This “loophole” meant that many people became FFLs to be able to continue to buy and sell like they always had. These people were called “kitchen FFLs”.

The ATF didn’t like it. The federal government didn’t like it. What good did it do to have this method to control the sale of guns when everybody was going out to get FFLs?

The ATF pushed back and the definition of an FFL was updated to restrict who could hold FFLs. This led to the Curio and Relic FFL. The idea being that people who were collecting should only be collecting “old” guns. If a gun was old enough, then you could buy it with your C&R FFL.

They are attempting to change the definition of “curio and relic” because early production AR-15s are now becoming C&R firearms.

There are different FFLs for different types of firearm commerce.

  1. Firearm Dealer/Gunsmith
  2. Pawnbroker
  3. Collector
  4. Manufacture of Ammunition
  5. Manufacturer of Firearms
  6. Importer of Firearms
  7. Dealer of “Destructive Devices”
  8. Manufacturer of “Destructive Devices”
  9. Importer of “Destructive Devices”

The “normal” FFL we interact with is a Type 01, Firearm Dealer/Gunsmith. A Type 07 FFL would be a manufacturer of firearms. If you are a Type 01, you cannot manufacture firearms for resale.

If you are a Type 07, you can manufacture for resale. While you or I might consider the most important task of manufacturing a firearm to be quality and safety, the reality is that it is the paperwork. There is an instant in time when a piece of aluminum becomes a firearm.

Since a manufacturer of firearms must have an accurate record of every firearm they have, the moment a “thing” becomes a “firearm” it must have the correct markings. If it does not, then the manufacturer is in violation of federal law.

What that means, is if you put a raw forging into a CNC machine, that CNC machine spits out a finished AR-15 lower which is taken to have a serial number stamped on it, you have broken the law. That firearm existed from the moment the CNC machine “created” the firearm. Until the serial number is stamped on it, it is an unserialized firearm, a big no-no in the commercial manufacturing of firearms.

Given that you have jumped through all the hoops to be a Type 07 FFL, now you can make “fun” things too! Right?

Not so fast.

The government recognizes that to reduce the number of fun things available, you make them more expensive. Having somebody making fun things is not really a good idea. So they add a tax to it. If you want to deal in NFA items, you have to pay a special occupation tax, or SOT, to the government.

With a SOT of the right class, an FFL can also deal in NFA items.

If a Type 08 FFL, an importer of firearms, wants to sell foreign made NFA items to the government, they have to get a Class 1 SOT. Let’s say you are the mayor of Chicago, and you want MP5s for your 149-man personal protection detail, at some point in the process, a Class 1 SOT with an FFL 08 would be required to import those MP-5s.

You can also import for research and development under Class 1 SOT.

If you want to make NFA items, you have to get a Class 2 SOT to go with your Type 07 FFL. At that point, you can start manufacturing most NFA items. What you cannot manufacture is machine guns.

The only people who are allowed to possess post 1985 manufactured machine guns are state actors. Even if you have those magic permission slips, making a machine gun is still a no-no.

A Class 3 SOT in combination with a Type 01 or 02 FFL allows that dealer or pawnbroker to buy and sell NFA items.

What this means in practice is that you can go get a Type 07 FFL and make model GFZ-007 pistols and sell them.

If you get a Class 2 SOT to go with that Type 07 FFL, you can make the model GFZ-007s, the version with the built-in silencer.

You still cannot make the GFZ-007g, the version with the giggle switch. That is forbidden.

Unless… You are making the GFZ-007g for a state actor.

How does the ATF know you are making it for a state actor? You have a letter from that state actor saying that they want a demonstration and are looking to buy some sort of giggling firearm.

Now you have the state actor requesting that you provide them with a demonstration. Since the state actor in most cases is a police department, these are called “law letters”.

So you manufacture a GFZ-007g, you show it to the state actor that asked to see one. They decide they would rather not buy it. You put it back in the safe as a “demo”. You now possess a post ’85 sample machine gun.

If you give up your FFL (or just your SOT), you have to divest yourself of that machine gun. You are not allowed to possess a post ’85 machine gun for your purposes. You are only allowed to have possession of it to demonstrate, in hopes of sales, to a state actor.

Now, there are some old boy friendly law enforcement groups. They often have good working relationships with the local gun people.

So you have a Type 07 FFL and a Class 2 SOT, and you decide you want to drill the extra hole and drop an auto-sear into your AR-15. That is illegal.

The next time the chief stops in, you mention to him that you’d like to have a law letter to do such a thing. He thinks about it and says, “hell yes, I’d love to get a chance to fire a full auto AR-15!”

A few days later, you have your law letter. You manufacture a full auto AR-15.

You call up the chief, and he comes out, and the two of you have a day of blasting through hundreds of rounds of 5.56×45 mm.

The Chief goes back happy, you’re happy. Life is good.

The next day, you are at lunch with some of the guys and somebody says, “wouldn’t be cool to make a full auto AK?” “Let’s do it!” you respond.

You still have that law letter, you can still manufacture machine guns. All should be good, right?

Nope, the state actor hasn’t requested that item. You don’t have all that is required to make that type of NFA item. You can still do it, but you have to try to sell it to the state actor, or it doesn’t count.

If the Chief wrote you that letter and there was never an interest by a state actor to acquire machine gun(s), then that letter is fraudulent.

If the law letter is fraudulent, then the Class 2 SOT doesn’t allow you to manufacture machine guns.

Conclusion

Numerous people that want to play with machine guns have jumped through the hoops to become the right type of FFL with the right type of SOT to acquire machine guns. Including getting a law letter.

The ATF is cracking down on those people who are getting the proper combination of permission cards from the government to possess post ’85 machine guns but never intended to sell to the government.

In some cases, the people involved knew what they were doing was a crime. Since they have been caught, they have to do the time.

We can hope that their lawyers bring up Second Amendment protection issues that lead to good outcomes, I don’t believe we are there yet.

Old Gear Still Works?

As I’ve said more than once, I’m old and fat. This means that the “high speed” gear of a younger, fitter, person doesn’t work for me. If I were to try an appendix carry, my Done-Lapped-Over would totally block access to my firearm.

I wear a belt to keep my pants up. No belt and my pants fall off. Some of that is because of the gear I carry in my pockets. A couple of knives, wallet, spare mags, you know the drill.

My original EDC was a small 9 mm which I carried in a pocket holster. Any belt was enough to keep my pants up and my firearm in place.

I finally upgraded to Alien Gear holster systems. I like them, they work for me. Their IWB works for me, as does their OWB versions.

They do have an important requirement, a belt.

I have no idea what happened to my original belt. I replaced it with a 100ft of braided para cord attached to a Gerber belt buckle. I made that myself.

This works “ok”, the problem with it as a belt was my belly lap got pinched and scraped by the belt buckle. When I added a holster with a firearm to it, the belt would twist and the buckle bit harder.

Upgrading to a “real” gun belt stabilized everything but left me with a new buckle that was biting my belly. Driving any distance, such as to any of my clients, and my belly would be raw. It was just not working.

I’ve lost weight and firmed up, so that is no longer an issue.

Regardless, during that period of time I had to stop wearing pants and switched to a shoulder holster. This worked, but it wasn’t something I had on when I was just working at home.

It got worse when I transitioned to carrying on my pants. That Alien Gear holster shell moved to my pants and gun belt and wasn’t available for my shoulder holster.

Which brings me to my newest holster.

As part of my losing weight, my pants started falling off. Unless I cinched my belt tighter than was comfortable, my gun would pull my pants off. I found myself using my shirt as sort of suspenders to hold up my belt on that side.

This leads me to getting some “real” suspenders. Not the stretchy kind, but solid load bearing suspenders. The first pair I got were for holding up your tool belt. They have big padded shoulders and are black webbing and look awful. I replaced these with a nice pair of Y Suspenders from Hide & Drink.

These look nice and just painplain work.

I still wasn’t wearing my EDC every day at home. Comfort being the excuse. I was watching a video by Paul Harrell where he explained why he wore an older style of USGI web gear, it might be ALICE got me thinking.

So I picked up a m1936 web belt with M1911 leather holster along with a .45 mag pouch. I added a WWII repo medical pouch and m1936 suspenders.

The web belt arrived yesterday, I’ve been wearing it with 1911 and two magazines while awake and at home.

Damn if it isn’t the most comfortable combination I’ve worn, so far.

The position of the mag pouch isn’t perfect, but it isn’t horrible. The holster is in the right place for me. The belt fits my fat belly/waist. The suspenders aren’t here yet, but with that addition, this will be darn near perfect for around the house and yard.

The flap holster is such that it is very non-threatening to gun people and cops. They know the firearm is there, but that flap signals that the pistol isn’t coming out rapidly. For anti-gun people, I don’t want to talk to them anyway. If I’m at all concerned, it is still easy access and rapid enough.

When sitting, nothing is poking into me. It is just comfortable.

Maybe those old farts knew something?

Everytown Tries to Cheat (again)


B.L.U.F.

(??? words)


Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 28(j), amicus curiae Everytown for Gun Safety writes to notify this Court of supplemental authority supporting the constitutionality of the restrictions on firearms in parks in New York’s Concealed Carry Improvement Act (“CCIA”).1 In its amicus brief, Everytown pointed to 66 individual historical restrictions on firearms in parks and a compilation of federal restrictions. See Dkt. 193 (No. 22-2908) at 26 n.21 (linking to website).2 Everytown has since identified 53 additional examples and sources. We attach the full list as Exhibit A, with newly identified restrictions and sources highlighted.
[xCite item=”PHWMN32D” pos=0]

Looking at FRAP 28(j) we find that there is a 350-word limit on FRAP 28(j) letters. The letter is under 350 words, but the attached appendix is many pages long.

“Lazarus, if you wish, I will have that switch remounted at once. But—’Ten Words’?”
“Uh—” Lazarus looked ungracious. “Okay. ‘Ten Words.’ Not eleven.”
Weatheral hesitated a split second, then counted on his fingers: “I learned your language to explain why we
need you.”
“Ten by the Rule,” Lazarus admitted. “But meaning that you need fifty. Or five hundred. Or five thousand.”
[xCite item=”MSA6LC7Y” pos=1]

A FRAP 28(j) letter is supposed to be a citation to some new authoritative source. Authoritative from the courts’ perspective. I am not allowed to publish a 60-page article on my website and then submit a FRAP 28(j) letter with a citation and link back to my own article. There are rules for what “authoritative sources” are.

This letter fails at word limit, authoritative source, and actual citations.

The purported letter should not be accepted for these the above reasons.

I still expect the Second Circuit to rule to accept the FRAP 28(j) letter.

What is Everytown Bringing to the attention of the court

The included Appendix, titled “Exhibit A” is in the form of a table where each row consists of an ordinal/sequence number, location, year, “citation”, Key Language, and link. All the links are tinyurls, you can’t tell where they are going to take you until you follow them.

Bruen made it clear that when Heller says history and tradition, they are speaking of regulations, actual laws.

Under that definition, a rule promulgated by the ATF might not be considered a “regulation.” The ATF exists from Congress’s delegation of power to create rules under the regulations that Congress passed and the President signs. Just because the ATF makes a rule, that does not make it a regulation under Heller

The infringers have brought up school rules as a history of regulation. Rules that a school makes do not have the force of law.

In the same way, the rules and policies of an HOA do not have the force of law. They are enforced by contract.

The first reference Everytown makes is to “Minutes of Proceedings of the Board of Commissioners of the Central Park” (1858 at 166).

On motion of Mr. Dillon, the ordinances recommended by the Superintendent were adopted, as follows:
“Be it ordained by the Commissioners of the Central Park:
All persons are forbidden
To enter or leave the Park except by the gateways.
To climb or walk upon the wall.
To turn cattle, horses, goats or swine into the Park.
To carry fire-arms or to throw stones or other missiles within it.
To cut, break, or in any way injure or deface the trees, shrubs, plants, turf, or any of the buildings, fences, bridges, or other constructions upon the Park;
Or to converse with, or in any way hinder those engaged in its construction.
[xCite item=”NJD994VD” p=166 pos=2]

You really have to give them credit, they must have had people OCRing documents dating back as far as they could go to do keyword searches on them. From a technical aspect, it is an impressive job.

One of the things that Heller instructs the inferior courts in, was to look at the how and why of a regulation. This commission is forbidding 6 actions within Central Park. They have removed it as a “commons”. A common is a place for the common use of the people of the village. It was often grazed by different people.

They are forcing people to enter and leave via controlled access points. No going over the wall.

They tell people not to vandalize the vegetation nor the buildings within the Park, to include picking flowers.

They also don’t want people to delay the work being done.

Some of these things would have to be handled via laws. The following paragraphs suggest that there is the power of city law behind these ordinances.

The question that comes to mind is whether there was a fire-arms restriction in other parts of the city or other city parks?

The earliest reference they give is the one quoted above from 1858. The latest was from 1940. EVEN if the court were to accept the letter, they should discard all of the references because none of them reference regulations from the time of the founding.

Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure


B.L.U.F.A look at FRAP as it applies to civil cases, most Second Amendment challenges are civil cases. Tied to games being played by Everytown in Antonyuk v. Hochul, 22-2972, (2d Cir.)

(1400 words)


There are rules for everything that the courts do. There are standard forms that are to be used. There is a general set of rules, written by congress, and each “court” can have additional, published rules.

When a party does something in a case, they must abide by the rules of that court.

FRAP starts with Rule 1, giving us the scope of the rules.

  1. Scope of Rules.
    1. These rules govern procedure in the United States courts of appeals.
    2. When these rules provide for filing a motion or other document in the district court, the procedure must comply with the practice of the district court.

Of course, since this is the government writing rules for the government, what they give with one hand, they remove with the other:

Rule 2. Suspension of Rules

On its own or a party’s motion, a court of appeals may—to expedite its decision or for other good cause—suspend any provision of these rules in a particular case and order proceedings as it directs, except as otherwise provided in Rule 26(b).

Some of this makes perfect sense, and we see it in use all the time.

For example, we have this docket entry:

MOTION, to file oversized brief, on behalf of Appellant Matthew J. Doran and Steven A. Nigrelli in 22-2908

When looking at the actual motion, it starts with a standard form following FRAP Rule 27.
Read More

Friday Feedback

We end the week with good news out of California. Judge Benitez has ruled that assault weapon bans are unconstitutional.

The case is Miller v. Becerra, 3:19-cv-01537, (S.D. Cal.)

I’ll be doing some writing about F.R.A.P. and this case over the weekend. Maybe I can keep it down to just a few thousand words.

Anybody want to place bets on how many words pour out of my fingers over the weekend?

Regardless, the comments are open, please let us know what you are thinking about, what you want us to write about.

Side story, back in 2016, a bunch of hooligans were defacing my friend’s home. She is a former IDF. At that time, she was a pacifist. I don’t know where she stands on that front at this moment.

The important part was that these monsters were painting NAZI symbols on her door and driveway.

I offered to drive over in the redneck truck and sleep in her driveway for a few days. She didn’t take up the offer.

That offer is extended to J.Kb. if he wants to take us up on it.

My lady offered a great idea to our friend. Our friend rigged an air horn with a trip wire. When the savages showed up that night, they tripped the wire and the air horn went off in their ears. I’m told there were only brown stains on the walk way that night, and no more graffiti.

Ohio, Et Al. v. EPA

B.L.U.F.
How things fit together. It isn’t just Second Amendment items that the Supreme Court is fixing, it is a wealth of other issues. This is just one.
(1700 words)


I’ve been working on software to monitor Supreme Court cases. Both their merits docket and their emergency docket. Most of the entries on the Emergency Docket are requests for “Extend deadline”, today three cases requesting a “Stay” were put on the docket.

Looking at the titles, all were “v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.”. I decided to find out what was happening that three cases challenging the EPA ere docketed today.

As Second Amendment activists, we know how the government plays their game of infringement. They claim that The People aren’t implicated in this infringement, they claim that the conduct proposed isn’t really protected, they argue that the arm they are banning isn’t an arm, or they claim that it isn’t their burden to prove that an arm is not in common use.

These infringements come from the executive using a “Pen and a phone”, from regulatory agencies making regulations outside their delegated powers. From legislatures passing bills that are simply infringements.

All of them twist the words of the Constitution and Heller to take our protections away.

While I have not looked at the legal foundation for the establishment of the EPA, I’m going to go out on a limb and guess “The Commerce Clause”. In other words, it isn’t part of the enumerated powers granted to the Federal Government.

While we have been in our little niche over here, fighting to hold on to our rights, other groups have been fighting on other fronts. One of the biggest of those scams is the “Climate Emergency!!!!”.
Read More

How I hate Massachusetts

As we know, Massachusetts has some of the worst Second Amendment infringements in the country. They are attempting to worsen it.

To own a firearm in Massachusetts, you have to have the state’s permission. This is a firearm owner’s identification. I don’t know what its official name is. I have been reliably informed that they are called a FID in Massachusetts

I learned about this bit of nasty when I was working for Sun Microsystems down in the Boston area. My boss, who was a gun owner, was telling me the story of how he lost access to his guns for a while.

He, like many other surfs in Massachusetts, got one of these FOID like cards when they were first issued. He was fairly young at the time. The card was good for life.

He had to move somewhere and transferred his firearms to his father for safe keeping. When he came back into the state, he asked his father for his firearms back. His father asked if he had his FOID.

“Of course I have,” he said and pulled out his card.

His father explained to him that the card that was good for life had been cancelled. FOID cards now expired. My boss had to apply and do all the processes to get a new FOID to get his firearms back from his father.

But did you know that you need that same ID to possess ammunition or ammunition components in the kingdom of Massachusetts?

That’s right, you have to show your card to purchase ammo. Or parts to make ammo. Like primers, shell cases, bullets, and powder. All require the king’s permission to purchase or possess.

How bad is this? A few years ago, a history professor went down to Virginia to visit some Civil War battlefields. While there, he found or was given a musket ball from the battle. When he returned to his university, he placed it in a little display on his desk.

Somebody noticed. That somebody then reported it to the police. The police came, identified it as a bullet and asked to see his FOID. This professor was an anti-gun infringer, of course he didn’t have a FOID. He was arrested for having “ammunition components without a FOID”.

This went to court. In court, the judge agreed with the state, and it was later upheld: A 100+ year old musket ball was an ammunition component. The professor got jail time.

Why do I hate them so much? Because I have to enter Mordor from time to time.

A few years back, I was driving down to Mordor to pick up my kids from an event they were attending. I was driving my wife’s car. I happened to notice some 30-06 blank cases sitting in the dash. My kids had picked them up from the Honor Guard rifle solute on Veterans Day.

I didn’t think anything about it until I got home. Then I got the cold sweats. Those empty shell casings were go-to-jail on a felon count for each one if I had been pulled over by a cop. If my wife had been pulled over, it was likely she would have talked herself into extra charges.

Every time I go to Mordor, I check my coat pockets to make sure I haven’t picked up a shell casing, either on purpose or accidentally. I’ve had cases bounce into my pockets when shooting at the range.

Know the regulations for where you are, for where you are going, for the places in between. Then check, double check, and then check again.

There are people out there that would like nothing less than to stitch you up for an extended stay on felony charges because you are a firearms owner.

Vanderstok v. Garland(Frames and Receivers)


B.L.U.F.
As we’ve talked about, cases change numbers and names as they travel through the system.

This is a history of the VanDerStok v. Garland cases as they have moved through the courts. If you make it too the end, it discusses where we are and what the tea leaves have been.
(1400 words)


History

Aug 11, 2022
Complaint filed by Jennifer VanDerStok et al. challenging the ATF’s frame and receiver rule
Aug 17, 2022
Motion for injunction filed by Plaintiffs (Good Guys)
Aug 18, 2022
ATF moves to have the case transferred to a different court.
Aug 29, 2022
The court asks the parties to argue for or against shortening the case by combining the preliminary injunction phase with the merits phase.
Sep 2, 2022
The court grants a preliminary injunction in part. (good news)
Sep 10, 2022
The court declines to transfer the case
Sep 16, 2022
The court orders everybody to hurry up. They want expedited briefings
Oct 1, 2022
The court expands the scope of who is covered by the injunction. (good news)
Oct 25, 2022
The ATF filed the administrative record the day before, the Court now tells everybody that this is going to move fast and be prepared to argue the merits (no preliminary injunction hearings) 14 days after the Court says go.
Nov 1, 2022
The ATF lets the court know they are asking the Fifth Circuit to stop the preliminary injunction
Nov 3, 2022
The Court adds BlackHawk Manufacturing Group to the list of protected parties under the Preliminary Injunction
Dec 23, 2022
The plaintiffs (good guys) file a motion for Summary Judgement
Feb 13, 2023
The ATF files a cross motion for Summary Judgement
Mar 6, 2023
The Court grants Defense Distributed and Second Amendment Foundation coverage under the original preliminary injunction.
Jun 27, 2023
Fifth Circuit court has all briefings in hand and scheduled oral arguments for Sep, 2023
Jul 5, 2023
The court issues its final judgement. In that judgement, they find that the final rule violates ATF’s statutory jurisdiction and vacates the final rule.
Jul 14, 2023
The ATF asks for an Emergency Stay pending appeal
The Fifth Circuit Court dockets a new case.
July 18, 2023
The Court grants a 7-day administrative stay
Jul 25, 2023
The Fifth Circuit calendars the case for Sep 7, 2023.
The District court issues a stay pending appeal
Jul 24, 2023
The Fifth Circuit court stays the vacatur pending appeal
Jul 27, 2023
The ATF requests a stay from the Supreme court regarding the Preliminary Injunction and Final Judgement
Aug 8, 2023
The Supreme Court stays the vacatur of the Northern District Court of Texas. (bad news)
Sep 6, 2023
The Fifth Circuit Court dismisses the appeal because the ATF asked them in one case.
Sep 7, 2023
Oral argument heard before Judges Willett, Engelhardt, Oldham

Sep 14, 2023
The district court enjoins the ATF from enforcing their final rule

Sep 25, 2023
Oral arguments are scheduled for Sep 28, 2023
Sep 28, 2023
Oral arguments are heard
Oct 2, 2023
The Fifth Circuit Court vacates the injunction as to non-parties. (so-so news)
Oct 5, 2023
ATF applies to the Supreme Court to vacate the injunction pending appeal on the Emergency Docket
Oct 6, 2023
Justice Alito stays the injunction administratively for 10 days.
Justice Alito orders all responses to be in place by Oct 11, 2023
Oct 16, 2023
The application is referred to the court
The September 14, 2023, order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, case No 4:22-cv-691, is vacated

Injunctions, Vacaturs, Stays and Judgements, Oh My!

Read More

Tuesday Tunes

I think we all have one of these friends:

A couple of years ago, I switched to two different storage methods for reloading. The first is a wall unit with removable bins. Lots of different sized bins available. You can get add on lids for the bins. All in all, a great choice.

Until I realized I had too much. From there I moved to MTM crates and ammo can crates. The simple crates are just sealable boxes of different sizes. Good handles on the side, and they can hold a fair bit. I started storing bullets and other gear of that sort in them. There is one crate that is nothing but misc magazines, for example.

The other crates hold 4 or 5 ammo cans each. 4 50 cal cans or 5 30 cal cans. They have some for their plastic ammo cans and some for regular GI metal cans. I use both.

A few months ago, I found some 8 mm Mauser boxer primer cases. I picked up 125 for a good price. This is good. I can now make freedom delivery systems for the K98. A week or so ago, my Redding 8×57 mm dies showed up. I resized 10 cases, measured them, they don’t need to be trimmed. All good.

I started my research knowing that 8×57 didn’t take the same bullets as 30-06 or 7.62×51 NATO. No problem. In my research, I found what, I thought, was a great piece of interest. This was from my reloading sources, so it was good information.

7×57 mm cartridges use the same bullets as .303 British. This is wonderful! I have lots of .312 bullets.

I can’t find them. They are nowhere to be found. I started tearing the reloading room apart. The crates labeled “bullets” are at the bottom of the stacks. And when I got to them, I found 1000s of bullets. None of them .312.

I became more methodical. I started opening every can to check what was in them. On about the 15th can I open, a 50 cal can, I find it has the neat trays in it. It was at that point I remembered that I had put a number of bullets in those trays, to make it easy to find.

Sure enough, I find my Hornady SST .312 150gr bullets. This is wonderful. I weigh and measure the bullets. 150gr, 0.312, all good. I pull open my sources, yep, 7×57 takes .310-.312. Everything is going well.

I open up my reloading book, pick my powder, IMR 4895, start writing down my planned loads. I’m just about to prime the cases when I look at the bullets and the cases. Those necks look bigger than the bullets. I take a bullet, put it in the neck of the case and it falls in. That neck is larger than the bullet by an unreasonable amount.

Back to the books, 7×57 is 0.310-0.312… Whiskey-Tango-Foxtrot? The references are 7.92 mm by 57 mm. So, 0.312 does seem a little small.

Back to the books, 7×57 is still 0.310-0.312

DOH. No wonder I was rounding off the corners.

I want 8×57, not 7×57.

The Mauser is available in many calibers. 7.92 mm is expressed as 8 mm in the references. They also make a 7.62 by 57 called the 7×57 mm. I was looking up the wrong data.

Be careful out there.

Here’s a higher resolution video by Curb.

First shipments!

J.Kb. took the plunge yesterday and printed mailing labels from WooCommerce. I expect people to start seeing their goods shortly.

Because we are new to this, the hook and loop stuff didn’t get processed correctly. I’m still going to send them, I’ll figure out how to make it work.

Thank you for your patience.