Category: Rant
-
Oregon Firearms Federation, Inc. v. Brown, Judges Opinion
B.L.U.F. An analysis of the horrible opinion out of Oregon where the district Judge decided that arms aren’t covered under the Second Amendment and that there is a history and tradition of requiring government approval before you can exercise your Second Amendment protected rights. This opinion is 122 pages long. This is not a complete…
-
inJustice Jackson
B.L.U.F. A look at the recent Affirmative Action case before the Supreme Court. Originally, I intended to take Jackson apart with her own words. Instead, this is the Constitutionalist on the Court doing it for me. Having read Roberts’, Thomas’ and Gorsuch’s opinion and concurrence, it is pretty obvious that they are not sitting silent…
-
Are the courts balanced in amicus curiae?
According to one of the lawyers that speaks on Second Amendment rights, the policy of the courts on accepting amicus curiae from anybody is a rather recent policy change with the courts. It used to be that you had to show real reasons to be considered a friend of the court. Of the hundreds of…
-
Brady Amicus Curiae Brief Renna v. Bonta (9th Cir.)
B.L.U.F. The argument from the mouths of the oldest group dedicated to removing your right to keep and bear arms. The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence (Brady) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to reducing gun violence through education, research, and legal advocacy. One of Brady’s primary goals is to encourage the implementation of safe…
-
To be blunt, Bruen fails to adhere to even basic academic standards – P.J.C.
In the District Judge issued multiple TROs blocking New Jersey’s Chapter 131 Bruen response bill. She then consolidated the case with Siegel and on May 16, 2023, the court issued a preliminary injunction, blocking parts of Chapter 131. The same day, the District Court issued the preliminary injunction, the state filed for an emergency stay…
-
Games People Play -> You Lie Down with Dogs
Background The Supreme Court has ruled that the meaning of an Amendment is locked to the time it was adopted. The People at that moment of time analyzed the end and decided that the means proposed was properly balanced. If The People decide that the original analysis was wrong, they will go through the process…
-
The Games People Play
In talking to my wife this morning, she was telling me how angry she got reading about Judge Easterbrook and Illinois’ continual attack on the Second Amendment. She couldn’t understand why they kept doing what they were doing. There is no need to delve into the “whys” of it, it is not relevant. The only…
-
Lies, Damn Lie, and Lawyer Speak
For the last couple of weeks, I’ve been working with a great group of people at the CourtListener site. They are one of a number of projects that are supported by the Free Law Project. All of this started because I asked for help uploading a document I had paid for. The project lead helped…
-
If your cause is just, why do you cheat? Oregon
Last year the people of Oregon, by a bare majority, voted in a truck load of infringements. These included permit to purchase, gun registries, magazine bans, and many other Bruen FU’s. This was Measure 114. The measure was so bad that even the political class didn’t want it to go into effect immediately. It did.…
-
Did the court get it right in Boland v. Bonta?
When looking at Boland v. Bonta, the “Unsafe Handgun Act” out of California, it was nice that the judge “got it right”. Unfortunately the reasoning that he had in his opinion niggled at me. There was something wrong. It should have been this hard. Then Mark Smith applied the clue-by-four and it made things obvious.…