Category: Case Analysis
-
Lance Boland v. Rob Bonta, CA UHA (9th Cir.)
B.L.U.F. The 9th Circuit court is about to hear oral arguments on the California Unsafe Hand Gun act. Everybody wants to get their oar in the water, here is one such oar. Who Peace Officers Research Association of California, The California State Sheriffs’ Association, The California Police Chiefs Association, The California Association of Highway Patrolmen,…
-
O.F.F. v. Brown, Order denying Preliminary Injunction and Summary Judgement
B.L.U.F.A District Court judge decides that it isn’t law that is being questioned but facts. In the Beginning Finding that this case implicates important and unsettled questions of law, this Court exercises its discretion to deny both Defendants’ and Plaintiffs’ motions. This Court additionally finds that the record contains genuine disputes of material fact, which…
-
Renna v. Bonta, 9th Cir. CA Unsafe Handgun Act
B.L.U.F. A look at the state’s appeal to the Ninth Circuit court. The District Court granted a preliminary injunction blocking part of the California roster infringement. The Question As you read different case filings, you quickly find that the parties are supposed to respectful and polite. Much like a congressional representative says, “My friend from…
-
Oregon Firearms Federation, Inc. v. Brown
B.L.U.F. Measure 114 Measure 114 turns the right to bear arms protected by the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution on its head. Measure 114 abolishes Oregonian’s constitutionally protected right to purchase firearms and own them for self-defense, turning it into a privilege, subject to the whims of government bureaucrats, that may be bestowed…
-
Koons v. Platkin — Part II
B.L.U.F. More on District Judge Renee Marie Bumb’s opinion on NJ’s Bruen spasm legislation, Chapter 131. The case is currently being appealed to the Third Circuit court as Ronald Koons v. Attorney General New Jersey, 23-1900, (3rd Cir.) Her Historical Analysis The first 50 pages or so of the opinion covered Judge Bumb’s analysis of…
-
Koons v Platkin — Bruen Spasm Response
B.L.U.F. A District Judge in New Jersey issues her order and opinion on a motion for a Preliminary Injunction. She is not happy with the state. She does an okay read of Bruen, finds in part for the plaintiffs (good guys) and in part for the defendants (bad guys/state). Good News In conclusion, the Second…
-
Antonyuk v. Hochul, 22-2972, (2d Cir.)
Brief update on the cases before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. There are a number of Second Amendment Cases that are before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. While other circuits will consolidate cases, it looks like the Second Circuit did not. This means that there are four or five different cases to track.…
-
Bad Judge Wants to Write More Bad Opinions
B.L.U.F. We previously wrote about how a single judge wrote a few terrible opinions. We now look at how he is using those same arguments in current cases, post Bruen. More History In 2019, the Seventh Circuit heard the case of Wilson v. Cook County, 937 F.3d 1028 (7th Cir. 2019). This was a case…
-
SCOTUS is watching
Back in December 2022, I posted NY CCIA challenge at SCOTUS. The GOA challenged the Second Circuit Court’s stay regarding an injunction from Judge Suddaby. Judge Suddaby enjoined the state from enforcing parts of the CCIA. The state ran to the Second Circuit Court, which heard the request for an emergency stay on an expedited…
-
A Chevron case to be heard by SCOTUS
In Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council I discussed a little about Chevron deference. This is the case law that allows the federal government to say “We are the experts, our interpretation of the law is always correct.” I am not qualified to know whether the original decision was a good decision or not, I…