It has been another week. We are slowly finding our rhythm. J.Kb. is doing a great job and high quality content. Miguel is doing his hit and run postings. I’m just hanging on by my fingernails.

Status things:
We still plan to start using memberships in another week. I’ve been writing a new theme that will look like the current theme but provide the features we need under the membership model.

The site decided to purge all the nonces. This is how your browser tells the site that you are the same person on the same browser. Unfortunately it doesn’t really tell you this until you try and post a comment, at which point it gives a nasty message.

The fix is to go to the home page and reload.

As part of the move we prestaged the site to gunfreezone.troglodite.com. This allowed us to do testing and such. Unfortunately the process also turned all of the gunfreezone.net mentions in the database into gunfreezone.troglodite.com. This was most easily seen when clicking on the Gun Free Zone Banner.

This is fixed in the live site. There are still a few instances of the wrong name but nobody should see them.

Fixes in code but not on site yet:
It was brought to our attention that somebodies real name was used when they left a comment after becoming a member. This should not have happened. We’ve set it up to use your username as your display name for now and we’ve updated the code so that if you change your display name all comments you made as a member get the new display name.

WordPress, the software that runs this site, has a feature called “nickname”. If you set your nickname you can also set the your displayed name to your nickname. This will allow you to have a user name that is not displayed. Members can get to this feature by logging in and then going to the small bar at the top right that starts with “Howdy,” Use that to edit your profile and you can change your Nickname and your Display Name.

The stopper right now is we are adding the “Nickname” field to the registration and membership edit profile pages.

For members that are at the Shooter level, please feel free to contribute articles to the blog by sending to either awa(at)troglodite.com or gunfreezone(at)troglodite.com. Contributions will be posted under your name.

Finally, we’ve added code so that we can make “Feedback” Postings. A feedback posting is open to comments from anybody.

This is a feedback posting so you’ll be able to give whatever feedback about the site you want.

Go for it. Please let us know what we are doing right and what we need to change.

David was at Marjory Stoneman Douglas HS when the 2018 shooting took place. He walked out of a different building on campus and went home. His level of danger was a bit more than AOC’s on Jan 6th, 2021, but not much.

He has since turned this into a free ride at Harvard and a couple of scams. He recently started a pillow company that lasted just long enough for him to rack in money and then folded before delivering product. He also was upset about how hard it was to create an LLC in MA.

Guns are in the news so David is once again shouting “Look at me! Look at me!”

He disrupted a congressional hearing on Wednesday and was escorted from the hearing room by security.

Who invited him to the hearing? What are the charges being brought against him?

David Hogg disrupts House hearing on banning assault weapons

The contents of the Firearms Trace System database maintained by the National Trace Center of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives shall not be immune from legal process, shall be subject to subpoena or other discovery, shall be admissible as evidence, and may be used, relied on, or disclosed in any manner, and testimony or other evidence may be permitted based on the data, on the same basis as other information, in a civil action in any State (including the District of Columbia) or Federal court or in an administrative proceeding.

This little gotcha is scary. Consider this, you went into your LGS to buy that Glock, because Glock. While there you spot a used Kimber at less than 1/4 its normal price. You buy both.

By law your 4473 can not be used to create a registry. BUT there is a “multi gun purchase” form that must be sent into the ATF if multiple pistols are purchased within a certain time period.

It would not surprise me to learn that that information is in the FTS. It is the case that anytime a trace is done that information goes into the FTS. What else goes into the FTS is an open question.

This opens the FTS for use by the states as a gun registry.

B.L.U.F. H.R.2814 has been passed out of committee and will be voted on in the house shortly. It repeals the PLCAA and has some other nasty in it.

If you have the right to keep and bear arms but nobody will make or sell you arms, does the right still exist?

There are people that want only criminals and the government to have arms. They exist and they have been working at removing guns and other arms from The People for many many years.

Every gun control law starts with “for the good of the people we have to restrict them.”

The first(?) federal attack on gun ownership was the NFA. The congress knew it was unconstitutional to limit the right of the people to keep and bear arms so they made it to expensive to own certain classes of firearms. They then prosecuted people for failure to pay a tax, not for owning an NFA weapon. Over time the penalties increased. An entire new class of NFA items, destructive devices, was added to the NFA.

Today you can’t own an NFA item without government permission unless you are a criminal.

The NFA was augmented with the GCA and other laws over time.

The people of these United States responded with a “hell no” and continued to buy, sell, manufacture guns. More people participate in firearm related sports than ever before. More people own guns for protection than ever before.

In response to Americans refusing to give up their rights, the gun control groups found a new method, “lawfare” Lawfair is using the courts to attack people without an intention of winning the case. “The process is the punishment.” To put it another way, they were going to sue the gun industry, from top to bottom, right out of existence.

What this meant was that gun stores, manufacturers, trainers and anybody else associated with the gun industry was suddenly subject to lawsuits.

Some animal uses a gun he bought to kill a fellow gang banger and the store he bought it from got sued. Some asshole shoots up a school and the manufacturer of the gun used gets sued.

At every point in the supply chain lawsuits were happening.

Congress, both Democrats and Republicans, responded by passing the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. The PLCAA, in short, said that you can’t be sued if somebody else uses a gun to commit a crime.

Animal buys gun from FFL and then shoots up a school, he’s responsible, not the FFL. In general cases brought in violation of the PLCAA are dismissed before the prices get out of hand.

That changed after Sandy Hook. The plaintiffs looked for a way around the PLCAA and found one. The manufacturer of the firearm used in the shooting could be sued for their advertisements, not for making or selling the firearm.

The case was settled out of court when the insurance companies paid up rather than fight the case.

A number of states have started adding laws that make it easier to sue FFLs and manufacturers for doing lawful commerce.

Yesterday the House Judiciary Committee voted out H.R. 2814 which would repeal the PLCAA.

Schiff’s Equal Access to Justice for Victims of Gun Violence Act co-sponsored by Reps. Dwight Evans (D-Pa.), Jason Crow (D-Colo.), and 70 other House members, would repeal the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act to ensure the gun industry – including manufacturers, sellers, and interest groups – is not shielded from liability when it acts with negligence and disregard for public safety. The bill would allow civil cases to go forward against irresponsible actors in state and federal courts – just as they would if they involved any other product – and give victims of gun violence and their families their day in court. The bill would also incentivize responsible business practices that would reduce gun injuries and deaths.
— Schiff Bill to Repeal Gun Industry Liability Shield Passed Out of Committee

Back in November of 2021 some asshole went on a murder spree at Oxford High School. The little shit killed four students before being taken into custody.

As part of the investigation it was found that his parents purchased the gun he used for him.

The prosecution is claiming that the parents committed involuntary manslaughter.

[Judge Cheryl] Matthews concluded the prosecution had presented enough evidence to proceed with the involuntary manslaughter charges against the [redacted], who are accused of ignoring the mental health needs of their son, buying him a gun instead of getting him help, and failing to notify the school that he had access to a gun when they were summoned to the office over a violent drawing he had made on the morning before the shooting.

The defense is arguing that the prosecution is attempting to get the courts to legislate from the bench. They are arguing that they had secured the gun and had no idea that their son was planning to go on a murder rampage.

Unfortunately we hear way to much about the backgrounds of these murdering assholes. They mostly come from fatherless families. They have unstable home lives. They are often known for being antisocial or having violent tendencies. They are almost always “known to law enforcement.”

The prosecutors want to make it a crime to not predict how a child will act. What parent would willingly have a firearm in their home if they even remotely considered that their child might use a firearm for criminal purposes?

The goal of the gun rights infringers is to make it to costly to carry, to costly to sell or manufacture firearms, to costly to own a firearm. At the same time they are actively working to paint every gun owner as a crime waiting to happen.

The Detroit Free Press does a fairly balanced article on the appeal of the assholes parents.
[Parents] ask appeals court to toss case: Our son did this, not us

Diving into the leftist cesspit of NPR is not my favorite read. Today they surprised me with a balanced article. Not fully but not tilted so far left that the deck chairs are tumbling into the sea.

You write, this court is not ideologically motivated, which, of course, is hard for some people to accept because they just produced what can easily be seen as Republican outcomes on abortion rights, gun laws and climate regulation. Granted, some rulings have gone the other way, but the big ones all went one way in rapid succession. What’s the case that those rulings are not ideological?

CURT LEVEY: Well, the case is that the court – if they wanted to decide all cases with a conservative outcome, they could have, and they didn’t. Conservatives were very unhappy with their decision about the Remain in Mexico policy. They turned down a vaccine mandate case from New York. So the court could’ve been 100% conservative outcomes. And it wasn’t. And if you look at why, it’s because it’s a textualist court. Some people like to call it originalist. I prefer the term textualist, but they’re often used in the same way. If you want to understand why they ruled one way on guns and another way on abortion, it’s because the Constitution contains an explicit Second Amendment that guarantees the right to keep and bear arms, whereas the Constitution – not only does it not contain a right to abortion. It doesn’t even contain a general right to privacy.

They interview with Curt Levey, a member of the Federalist Society, isn’t gotcha, isn’t nasty, it is very matter of fact and does bring up good points.

Read the entire thing over at NPR:
Is the Supreme Court majority ruling on the law or their personal preference?

While the report claims this the shooter claims it was a prank gone wrong. It sounds more like homicide to me. Not sure which level.

It seems that the owner of a gun store bought a replica BB gun (airsoft?) and put it in the display case. He then claims he accidently picked up the wrong gun, pointed it at an employee as a prank and pulled the trigger.

The firearm was loaded and he killed the employee.

Any prank that starts with a firearm is a bad idea. Any prank that starts with a replica firearm in a situation where it is likely to be perceived as a real gun is a bad idea. Any prank that violates the four safety rules is a bad idea.

What the hell was going on that there was a firearm in a display case with a live round? At all of my LGS, even the ones I don’t like, nothing goes back in the case until it has been cleared. My LGS takes the firearm out of the case, clears the weapon, shows me that it is clear, passes it to me, I clear the weapon. We continue to follow the four rules. We follow the same procedure handing it back and it doesn’t go back into the case until it has been cleared and wiped down.

But OSHA is treating this as a safety violation: “The business failed to furnish a place of employment which is free of recognized hazards which may cause death or serious physical harm.”

Documents: OSHA fines SC gun store after employee killed during ‘prank’ gone wrong

Law and Order is not the normal state of a society. Only highly functional societies have working law and order. The phrase sometimes used is “rule of law”.

The rule of law is when there is a written system of laws that applies to everybody equally. If the laws are not applied equally then the system starts to break down. Unfortunately even in good societies it is possible to subvert the rule of law based on the actions of law enforcement, prosecution and judicial employees.

If the cops turn a blind eye to crime based on who is committing the crime the rule of law starts to break down. If the prosecutors fail to bring charges or bring reduced charges based on who is committing the crime then the rule of law starts to break down. If the judges give out punishments that are based on who is committing the crime then the rule of law starts to break down.

This can even extend into the corrections facilities when who committed the crime affects how they are treated.

This happens in both directions, under arresting and over arresting, under charging and over charging, under sentencing and over sentencing. It happens.

Our current society has a feeling of the rule of law breaking down. An old man is attacked behind the counter of the store, he defends himself, he’s arrested and charged. A suburban couple fears for their lives and property and stand armed are arrested and charged. A young man is chased by a older stronger violent man intent on taking the young man’s weapon defends himself and is charged and arrested.

On the other side of the equation are all the criminals with long lists of arrests, charges and convictions that are still out committing crimes.

Of course there are the “An’t don’ n’ting” where it is very questionable as to how much nothing wasn’t done. Unfortunately these situations are often used to make still more people feel that the rule of law is breaking down.

When the rule of law cease to exist the people band together to enforce the laws they think should be enforced. This leads to strange fruit hanging from southern trees.

Lynchings were the results of people enforcing the laws that they felt should exist in the way they felt they should be enforced. The cattle rustler hanging from a tree was a lynching. The murdering scoundrel pulled from the town jail to be hung from the nearest street post was a lynching. The black man pulled from his horse and hung for daring to look at a white woman was a lynching.

The white men moving south bringing the sounds of freedom hung from trees were lynchings.

When law and order breaks down, strange fruit come to hang from the trees.

Nina Simone’s version with graphic images:

Full report at cnn.com: READ: The Uvalde report

Of necessity, this report will describe the shortcomings and failures of the Uvalde Consolidated Independent School District and of various agencies and officers of law enforcement. At the outset, we acknowledge that those same shortcomings could be found throughout the State of Texas…

“There is no one whom we can attribute malice or ill motives. Instead, we found systemic failures and egregiously poor decision making.”

Wow. Harsh words but nowhere near the anger I feel for the cowards that stood hiding from the shooter while children died.

There is a screen capture of one officer checking his phone constantly as he stands behind the corner far from the shooter. He has the Punisher screensaver. There was an article that stated the reason that he kept checking his phone was he was waiting for a message from his wife, a teacher at the school. The report implied that his wife was one of those killed.

If his wife was one of those killed I feel for him. I also hope he lives in torment for the rest of his life because he stood there with his body armor, his side arm, with access to a rifle and refused to advance to the sounds of gun fire. He refused to save his wife and those children.

Checking his phone for a message from his wife isn’t an excuse, it is condemnation..

… While the school had adopted security policies to lock exterior doors and internal classroom doors, there was a regrettable culture of noncompliance by school personnel who frequently propped doors open and deliberately circumvented locks. At a minimum, school administrators and school district police tacitly condoned this behavior as they were aware of these unsafe practices and did not treat them as serious infractions requiring immediate correction. In fact, the school actually suggested circumventing the locks as a solution for the convenience of substitute teachers and others who lacked their own keys.

It wasn’t that some teacher left the door propped open, it was that the door didn’t lock like it was suppose to. It didn’t lock like it was suppose to because the school didn’t get the doors repaired. The door to room 111 had a faulty lock. It had been discussed but nobody had bothered to write up a work order to get it fixed.

In addition to all of the above there were around 50 security alerts at the school between February and May of 2022. These were caused by “[the] frequent occurrence of human traffickers trying to outrun the police, usually ending with the smuggler crashing the vehicle and the passengers fleeing in all directions.”

That is almost one every other school day. Given the holidays in that time period darn close to one per day. No wonder the teachers were tired of security alerts.

Other factors delayed the reporting of the threat to the campus and to law enforcement. …

What??? We have the 911 call made while the shooter is still outside the building. That isn’t a delay. The most you can say is that the first shots at the men coming to the crash scene might have been delayed, but there was at least one teacher on the phone with 911 within a few minutes of the shooting starting, outside the building.

His entrance into the building that morning was unimpeded because ALL of the exterior doors to that building were unlocked. In violation of school policy.

At Robb Elementary, law enforcement responders failed to adhere to their active shooter training, and they failed to prioritize saving the lives of innocent victims over their own safety.

Cowards, all of them.

… The chief of police was one of the first responders on the scene. But as events unfolded, he failed to perform or to transfer to another person the role of incident commander. This was an essential duty he had assigned to himself in the plan mentioned above, yet it was not effectively performed by anyone. …

Looks like the Chief wanted the glory but when it came to perform he failed at every level.

The US military is given training on “illegal orders”. Every member of the US military understands that “I was just following orders.” Is not a defense. Thus they are required by law to evaluate every order given to make sure they are legal. In addition they are trained to work as a team and as individuals and to work without a leader.

One of the more interesting aspects of this is that killing leaders in the US military does not cause as much devastation to the battle as in other armies.

This style of leadership supposedly is followed within Law Enforcement.

There was no Incident Command Post on scene. No officer responding took it upon themselves to establish that command post nor to make sure that there was an actual incident commander. The Chief was the first domino of cowardice. There were more that fell from his failures.

There is a show I watched The Closer. One story arc details how they are going to get money for their budget by doubling as part of the terrorist response team for the LAPD. These officers went through the training, had all the documents and plans and people in positions of power signed off on it.

They were not actually qualified to be a part of a terrorist response team. They had those qualities on paper only.

That was a fictional story.

Uvalde is more of the same. It looks like there was money dangled in front of the school system for having an active shooter plan in place. So the chief had one of his minions write it up, likely cutting and pasting from other plans they found. The chief assigned himself to the part of “incident commander” and handed out parts to his other officers in the play they had written.

They then went and performed the full dress rehearsal to qualify for the (assumed) money.

When it was time to actually perform, they failed at every level. It all started at the top and the rank and file refused to accept responsibility for following IMO illegal orders.

Page 22 of the document is a massive condemnation of the chief. He had all the training required to do the right thing. Every failure that happened at Robb Elementary is discussed in the training he received. There is no excuse for his behavior that day.

He took an entire module on how to enter locked buildings and rooms with outward opening doors. He had the training to know that you don’t wait for keys. If you have them, great, if not move on. The module included information on how to breach using physical means.

… Uvalde CISD parents became so concerned about the number of bailouts occurring near the elementary-school campuses that they offered to hire off-duty police to supplement the Uvalde CISD police presence.

It appears that the offer to provide more security was turned down by the school district police. It makes you wonder why?

When the Internet was first being introduced to the world at large the people that had been using it were all the same sorts of geeks and nerds. Nobody would ever consider doing bad things on the internet. Besides, we’ve secured our equipment.

And then Windows got internet capability and all that changed. Windows had(has?) horrible security. The answer was firewalls. Put a moat around your campus and everybody inside would be safe.

At our campus Wi-Fi was just starting to be used, it required a boatload of paperwork to get an access point installed and more money than people wanted to spend.

Instead people hooked up their own modems to the internal network, bridging the moat/firewall, with no security. They plugged access points they purchased at Best Buy/Circuit City into the local network, letting anybody sitting in the picnic area to connect to the network, with no security.

The security policies did not take into account humans. When you get in the way of a person that wants to do something they will find away around it. Even if the thing they are doing is destroying security.

Th Uvalde CISD purchased an alert system that required a smart phone with a good signal or to be logged into a computer in order to receive or send alerts. They had such poor wi-fi in most buildings that teachers turned off their phones. Teachers didn’t carry their phones with them.

The alert system was bound to fail because the human factor was ignored. In addition, everybody that was able to receive alerts through the system could initiate an alert. This lead to alerts when a user heard about bailouts near the school campuses.

Over used and not handy, the alert system was a failure and nobody noticed.

Page 32 of the document describes the asshole. If you want to know more about him, read if from the linked document.

This 18yo dropped over $3k on rifles and ammunition. He didn’t have a car, he didn’t have a license, he didn’t know how to drive. Yet somehow he saved up over $3K. It is an interesting question of where he got his money.

At approximately 11:37a.m., the officers converged from both sides of the hallway on Rooms 111 and 112. Coming from the north, Lt. Martinez peered into the vestibule for Rooms 111 and 112, and he faced gunfire, getting grazed by fragments of building material on the top of his head. He immediately retreated to the north end of the hallway. On the opposite of the hall, fragments also hit SSgt. Canales on his ear. He likewise retreated and exited the building on the west side. No shots were fired at that time toward the attacker by the law enforcement responders.

And there we have the names of the cowards that were shot at and ran.

The report confirms that BORTAC made the decision to breach. They stacked up. When they did others stacked up with them. BORTAC made the breach. The chief testified that he did not give BORTAC the order to breach.

Cdr. Paul Guerrero stands as somebody who actually did. His is the first discussion that seems like he knew what he was doing and took charge. He was the acting commander of BORTAC. He arrived at 12:30 and by 12:35 was already testing a Halligan breaching tool. He then ordered Border Patrol agents to start setting up triage and medical. He and another agent were at the head of the stack unlocking the door and opening it for the breach.

This guy arrived and took charge of his men, evaluated the situation and did. Read page 61.

The chief appears to be in complete CYA. His basic statement is “I was just a police officer doing a police officer’s job. I was never in charge.” He failed completely at his duties.

Notes: The report on CNN is a series of images of the report. I transcribed the blockquotes and quotes from the images. Any errors in grammar or spelling in the quotes is entirely my fault.

Around 1800 on Sunday some asshole went into the Greenwood Park Mall in Indiana. He was armed with a rifle and multiple magazines.

Unfortunately he was able to kill 4 females. Two others were wounded and are being treated at a local hospital.

His shooting spree was ended by a good guy with a gun. A licenced CCW holder used his carry weapon to end the shooting.

No information is given on the asshole so my guess is that he is one of the protected classes. We’ll find out in the coming days. Also unmentioned is the type of rifle used. So that means it is unlikely to be an AR-15.

For the Democrats this is another fortuitously timed event as the Assault Weapons Ban of 2021 is going to a vote on the house floor this week.

4 dead, 2 wounded in shooting at Greenwood Park Mall; police said ‘good Samaritan’ shot and killed shooter
3 dead, 2 injured in shooting at Greenwood Park Mall, suspect killed by armed citizen

H/T to one of our readers for the Fox 59 link

UPDATE: The articles quoted have been changed. The article now reflects coroner reporting that there were two male victims and one female victim and one male asshole.

It is also being reported that the mall is marked as guns for criminals only. The hero choose to ignore the sign and carried.