Category: Case Analysis
-
Barnett v Raoul Illinois AWB/LCM bans Good news
B.L.U.F. I need another image with a cheerleader for courts that get it right. After fighting my way through the monstrosity from yesterday, this Memorandum and Order is great news for the Second Amendment community. This is (hopefully?) a short article, I might write something longer about our win in the future. My wife read…
-
Herrera v. Raoul Illinois AWB/LCM ban
B.L.U.F. The Court found that the country has a history and tradition from pre-founding through the modern day of banning dangerous weapons. The plaintiffs (good guys) have requested a Temporary and Preliminary Injunction to enjoy the state from enforcing the Illinois assault weapon ban as well as the large capacity magazine bans. This is a…
-
Scott Hardin v. ATF, 20-6380 (6th Cir. 2023) bump stocks
B.L.U.F. Why the Sixth Circuit Court found that the bump stock ban is not constitutional. This was not a Second Amendment challenge to the rule. Instead, it was an Article I, Section 1 challenge. All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate…
-
Hanson v. District of Columbia, magazine ban is consitutional
B.L.U.F. — Judge Rudolph Contreras believes that banning magazines with more than some magic number is constitutional. This leads to another WTF post analysis of a Judge’s opinion. The Question Is D.C.’s LCM ban Constitutional? The ban basically says that it is illegal to possess, sell, or transfer — D.C. Code § 7-2506.01(b) a magazine…
-
Example Lawfare
B.L.U.F. When a family is hurting, they want somebody to pay. It is easier to put that anger against a company than a dead body. Especially when there are blood vultures at work. History On April 15, 2021, some asshole entered the FedEx facility in Indianapolis, Indiana, and proceeded to start shooting. Eight people were…
-
Another One Bites the Dust — USA v. Connelly
B.L.U.F. Another case where a Judge used Bruen to come to the correct decision. This This one is §922(g)3 and §922(d)2. This is a criminal case in front of a US Federal Judge for the Western District of Texas. It highlights how case law works. History On December 28, 2021 the El Paso Police Department…
-
Things that go Bump in the dark, Cargill v. Burr
B.L.U.F. Those scary ammosexuals want to go bang fast but that’s scary because going bang fast is scary. So let’s ban scary bump stocks and get taken to the Supreme Court for infringing on the core civil rights of The People The question This case is not a second amendment case though it is a…
-
Boland v. Bonta Update.
B.L.U.F. In a strategic move the State of California is appealing to the Ninth Circus Court of Appeals in the “Unsafe Handgun Act” case. The district judge found the UHA unconstitutional by requiring Chamber Load Indicator(CLI), Magazine Disconnect Mechanism (MDM), and microstamping. The state is appealing the CLI and MDM but NOT microstamping. US District…
-
DSSA v. Del. Dept. of Safety and Homeland Security
B.L.U.F. District Court of Delaware Judge Richard Gibson Andrews decided on 2023-03-27 that a ban on some firearms and some magazines was constitutional in denying a preliminary injunction. Slight updates to correct spelling and Judge’s name. Delaware State Sportsmen’s Association, Inc v. Delaware Department of Safety and Homeland Security (1:22-cv-00951) Prior to Bruen the courts…
-
Measure 114 gets “Fixed”
B.L.U.F. An example of winning in court. Oregon’s legislature rushes to moot cases and to fix parts of Measure 114. H/T Bh.Z and OFF On January 9th, 2023 Senate Bill 348 was introduced. The bill was short. It was a bill giving the Oregon Department of Justice a requirement to …study ways to address the…