Vanderstok v. Garland(Frames and Receivers)
B.L.U.F.
As we’ve talked about, cases change numbers and names as they travel through the system.
This is a history of the VanDerStok v. Garland cases as they have moved through the courts. If you make it too the end, it discusses where we are and what the tea leaves have been.
(1400 words)
History
- Aug 11, 2022
- Complaint filed by Jennifer VanDerStok et al. challenging the ATF’s frame and receiver rule
- Aug 17, 2022
- Motion for injunction filed by Plaintiffs (Good Guys)
- Aug 18, 2022
- ATF moves to have the case transferred to a different court.
- Aug 29, 2022
- The court asks the parties to argue for or against shortening the case by combining the preliminary injunction phase with the merits phase.
- Sep 2, 2022
- The court grants a preliminary injunction in part. (good news)
- Sep 10, 2022
- The court declines to transfer the case
- Sep 16, 2022
- The court orders everybody to hurry up. They want expedited briefings
- Oct 1, 2022
- The court expands the scope of who is covered by the injunction. (good news)
- Oct 25, 2022
- The ATF filed the administrative record the day before, the Court now tells everybody that this is going to move fast and be prepared to argue the merits (no preliminary injunction hearings) 14 days after the Court says go.
- Nov 1, 2022
- The ATF lets the court know they are asking the Fifth Circuit to stop the preliminary injunction
- Nov 3, 2022
- The Court adds BlackHawk Manufacturing Group to the list of protected parties under the Preliminary Injunction
- Dec 23, 2022
- The plaintiffs (good guys) file a motion for Summary Judgement
- Feb 13, 2023
- The ATF files a cross motion for Summary Judgement
- Mar 6, 2023
- The Court grants Defense Distributed and Second Amendment Foundation coverage under the original preliminary injunction.
- Jun 27, 2023
- Fifth Circuit court has all briefings in hand and scheduled oral arguments for Sep, 2023
- Jul 5, 2023
- The court issues its final judgement. In that judgement, they find that the final rule violates ATF’s statutory jurisdiction and vacates the final rule.
- Jul 14, 2023
- The ATF asks for an Emergency Stay pending appeal
- The Fifth Circuit Court dockets a new case.
- July 18, 2023
- The Court grants a 7-day administrative stay
- Jul 25, 2023
- The Fifth Circuit calendars the case for Sep 7, 2023.
- The District court issues a stay pending appeal
- Jul 24, 2023
- The Fifth Circuit court stays the vacatur pending appeal
- Jul 27, 2023
- The ATF requests a stay from the Supreme court regarding the Preliminary Injunction and Final Judgement
- Aug 8, 2023
- The Supreme Court stays the vacatur of the Northern District Court of Texas. (bad news)
- Sep 6, 2023
- The Fifth Circuit Court dismisses the appeal because the ATF asked them in one case.
- Sep 7, 2023
- Oral argument heard before Judges Willett, Engelhardt, Oldham
- Sep 14, 2023
- The district court enjoins the ATF from enforcing their final rule
- Sep 25, 2023
- Oral arguments are scheduled for Sep 28, 2023
- Sep 28, 2023
- Oral arguments are heard
- Oct 2, 2023
- The Fifth Circuit Court vacates the injunction as to non-parties. (so-so news)
- Oct 5, 2023
- ATF applies to the Supreme Court to vacate the injunction pending appeal on the Emergency Docket
- Oct 6, 2023
- Justice Alito stays the injunction administratively for 10 days.
- Justice Alito orders all responses to be in place by Oct 11, 2023
- Oct 16, 2023
- The application is referred to the court
- The September 14, 2023, order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, case No 4:22-cv-691, is vacated